These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2057353)

  • 1. Effect of DNA bending in various regions of a consensus-like Escherichia coli promoter on its strength in vivo and structure of the open complex in vitro.
    Lozinski T; Adrych-Rozek K; Markiewicz WT; Wierzchowski K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1991 Jun; 19(11):2947-53. PubMed ID: 2057353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of reversed orientation and length of An.Tn DNA bending sequences in the -35 and spacer domains of a consensus-like Escherichia coli promoter on its strength in vivo and gross structure of the open complex in vitro.
    Loziński T; Wierzchowski KL
    Acta Biochim Pol; 1996; 43(1):265-79. PubMed ID: 8790731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the sequence-dependent structure of the 17 bp AT spacer on the strength of consensuslike E.coli promoters in vivo.
    Lozinski T; Markiewicz WT; Wyrzykiewicz TK; Wierzchowski KL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1989 May; 17(10):3855-63. PubMed ID: 2660103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sigma s-dependent promoters in Escherichia coli are located in DNA regions with intrinsic curvature.
    Espinosa-Urgel M; Tormo A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1993 Aug; 21(16):3667-70. PubMed ID: 8367283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential influence of DNA supercoiling on in vivo strength of promoters varying in structure and organisation in E. coli.
    Jyothirmai G; Mishra RK
    FEBS Lett; 1994 Mar; 340(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 8131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The organization of open complexes between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and DNA fragments carrying promoters either with or without consensus -35 region sequences.
    Chan B; Spassky A; Busby S
    Biochem J; 1990 Aug; 270(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 2204341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjacent upstream superhelical writhe influences an Escherichia coli promoter as measured by in vivo strength and in vitro open complex formation.
    Hirota Y; Ohyama T
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Dec; 254(4):566-78. PubMed ID: 7500334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcription regulation in vitro by an E. coli promoter containing a DNA cruciform in the '-35' region.
    Horwitz MS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1989 Jul; 17(14):5537-45. PubMed ID: 2668890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the consensus structure within the E. coli promoters.
    Nair TM; Kulkarni BD
    Biophys Chem; 1994 Jan; 48(3):383-93. PubMed ID: 8110961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isolation of promoters from two anaerobic bacteria.
    Roberts I; Hylemon PB; Holmes WM
    Microbios; 1988; 54(219):87-99. PubMed ID: 2459583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Streptococcus pneumoniae possesses canonical Escherichia coli (sigma 70) promoters.
    Morrison DA; Jaurin B
    Mol Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 4(7):1143-52. PubMed ID: 2233251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between DNA bending and transcriptional activation at a plasmid promoter.
    Pérez-Martín J; Espinosa M
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Aug; 241(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 8051709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of promoter activities in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: use of a new broad-host-range promoter-probe plasmid.
    Lodge J; Williams R; Bell A; Chan B; Busby S
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1990 Jan; 55(1-2):221-5. PubMed ID: 2109722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigations of Escherichia coli promoter sequences with artificial neural networks: new signals discovered upstream of the transcriptional startpoint.
    Pedersen AG; Engelbrecht J
    Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1995; 3():292-9. PubMed ID: 7584449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The seven E. coli ribosomal RNA operon upstream regulatory regions differ in structure and transcription factor binding efficiencies.
    Hillebrand A; Wurm R; Menzel A; Wagner R
    Biol Chem; 2005 Jun; 386(6):523-34. PubMed ID: 16006239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Promoters and autogenous control of the Escherichia coli hupA and hupB genes.
    Kohno K; Wada M; Kano Y; Imamoto F
    J Mol Biol; 1990 May; 213(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 2187099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequence distributions associated with DNA curvature are found upstream of strong E. coli promoters.
    Plaskon RR; Wartell RM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1987 Jan; 15(2):785-96. PubMed ID: 3547329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unusual properties of promoter-up mutations in the Escherichia coli galactose operon and evidence suggesting RNA polymerase-induced DNA bending.
    Kuhnke G; Fritz HJ; Ehring R
    EMBO J; 1987 Feb; 6(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 3034593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Promoter recognition by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Influence of DNA structure in the spacer separating the -10 and -35 regions.
    Auble DT; deHaseth PL
    J Mol Biol; 1988 Aug; 202(3):471-82. PubMed ID: 3050126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temperature-dependence of open-complex formation at two Escherichia coli promoters with extended -10 sequences.
    Burns HD; Belyaeva TA; Busby SJ; Minchin SD
    Biochem J; 1996 Jul; 317 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):305-11. PubMed ID: 8694780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.