These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20573530)

  • 1. Evaluation of smear layer removal after use of a canal brush: an SEM study.
    Garip Y; Sazak H; Gunday M; Hatipoglu S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e62-6. PubMed ID: 20573530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.
    Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
    Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
    Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
    Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.
    Naaman A; Kaloustian H; Ounsi HF; Naaman-Bou Abboud N; Ricci C; Medioni E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17211500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.
    Ghivari S; Kubasad G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
    Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.