102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20573595)
1. Sufficiency of the number of segregating sites in the limit under finite-sites mutation.
Roychoudhury A; Wakeley J
Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Sep; 78(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 20573595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the inadmissibility of Watterson's estimator.
Futschik A; Gach F
Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Mar; 73(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 18215409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating the scaled mutation rate and mutation bias with site frequency data.
Vogl C
Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Dec; 98():19-27. PubMed ID: 25453604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Some statistical improvements for estimating population size and mutation rate from segregating sites in DNA sequences.
Klein EK; Austerlitz F; Larédo C
Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Jun; 55(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 10366549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robustness of coalescent estimators to between-lineage mutation rate variation.
Kuhner MK
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Dec; 23(12):2355-60. PubMed ID: 16956973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Asymptotic behavior of the scaled mutation rate estimators.
Pinheiro HP; Kiihl SF; Pinheiro A; dos Reis SF
Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):400-16. PubMed ID: 20533409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximum likelihood estimation of population parameters.
Fu YX; Li WH
Genetics; 1993 Aug; 134(4):1261-70. PubMed ID: 8375660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The site-frequency spectrum of linked sites.
Xie X
Bull Math Biol; 2011 Mar; 73(3):459-94. PubMed ID: 20349153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of parameters in large offspring number models and ratios of coalescence times.
Eldon B
Theor Popul Biol; 2011 Aug; 80(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21570995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating effective population size or mutation rate using the frequencies of mutations of various classes in a sample of DNA sequences.
Fu YX
Genetics; 1994 Dec; 138(4):1375-86. PubMed ID: 7896116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Population genetic inference using a fixed number of segregating sites: a reassessment.
Ramos-Onsins SE; Mousset S; Mitchell-Olds T; Stephan W
Genet Res; 2007 Aug; 89(4):231-44. PubMed ID: 18208629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quasi-equilibrium theory for the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population: justification and implications.
Burr TL
Theor Popul Biol; 2000 May; 57(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 10828221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A note on the accuracy of PAC-likelihood inference with microsatellite data.
Cornuet JM; Beaumont MA
Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Feb; 71(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 16890970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lethals in subdivided populations.
Glémin S
Genet Res; 2005 Aug; 86(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 16181522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of coalescent likelihood estimates: do we need more sites, more sequences, or more loci?
Felsenstein J
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Mar; 23(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 16364968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probability of a segregating pattern in a sample of DNA sequences.
Fu YX
Theor Popul Biol; 1998 Aug; 54(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9680485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Coalescent-based estimation of population parameters when the number of demes changes over time.
Ewing G; Rodrigo A;
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16495347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A robust estimator of mutation rates.
Wu X; Strome ED; Meng Q; Hastings PJ; Plon SE; Kimmel M
Mutat Res; 2009 Feb; 661(1-2):101-9. PubMed ID: 19100753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical properties of segregating sites.
Fu YX
Theor Popul Biol; 1995 Oct; 48(2):172-97. PubMed ID: 7482370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Brownian models and coalescent structures.
Blum MG; Damerval C; Manel S; François O
Theor Popul Biol; 2004 May; 65(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 15066421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
