261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20573742)
1. What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
Angell E; Biggs H; Gahleitner F; Dixon-Woods M
Arch Dis Child; 2010 Nov; 95(11):915-7. PubMed ID: 20573742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.
Angell EL; Bryman A; Ashcroft RE; Dixon-Woods M
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Apr; 17(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18385408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
Angell E; Tarrant C; Dixon-Woods M
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):825-9. PubMed ID: 19734481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Written work: the social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters.
Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft RE; Bryman A
Soc Sci Med; 2007 Aug; 65(4):792-802. PubMed ID: 17490795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Children are not small adults: documentation of assent for research involving children.
Ungar D; Joffe S; Kodish E
J Pediatr; 2006 Jul; 149(1 Suppl):S31-3. PubMed ID: 16829240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognizing Risk and Vulnerability in Research Ethics: Imagining the "What Ifs?".
Peter E; Friedland J
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Apr; 12(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 28421885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards beneficence for young children in research: challenges for bioethics committees.
Farrell A
Med Law; 2010 Sep; 29(3):389-402. PubMed ID: 22145559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
Ballantyne A; Moore A
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent for pediatric research: is it really possible?
Kodish E
J Pediatr; 2003 Feb; 142(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 12584521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On the minimal risk threshold in research with children.
Binik A
Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(9):3-12. PubMed ID: 25127264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.
Tod AM; Nicolson P; Allmark P
J Adv Nurs; 2002 Nov; 40(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 12421396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consent and assent in paediatric research in low-income settings.
Cheah PY; Parker M
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():22. PubMed ID: 24597948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insights into the perception that research ethics committees are a barrier to research with seriously ill children: A study of committee minutes and correspondence with researchers studying seriously ill children.
Butler AE; Vincent K; Bluebond-Langner M
Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 34(3):413-423. PubMed ID: 31680629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conducting ethical research in pediatrics: a brief historical overview and review of pediatric regulations.
Diekema DS
J Pediatr; 2006 Jul; 149(1 Suppl):S3-11. PubMed ID: 16829239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project.
Dixon-Woods M; Foy C; Hayden C; Al-Shahi Salman R; Tebbutt S; Schroter S
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011973. PubMed ID: 27580832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research with children: a critical review of the guidelines.
Neill SJ
J Child Health Care; 2005 Mar; 9(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 15684439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters.
O'Reilly M; Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft R; Bryman A
Sociol Health Illn; 2009 Mar; 31(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 18983419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data.
Ballantyne A; Moore A; Bartholomew K; Aagaard N
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0235618. PubMed ID: 32756563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
