These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20573838)
1. Regression calibration for classical exposure measurement error in environmental epidemiology studies using multiple local surrogate exposures. Bateson TF; Wright JM Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 172(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 20573838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of exposure measurement error on particle matter epidemiology: a simulation using data from a panel study in Baltimore, MD. Schwartz J; Sarnat JA; Coull BA; Wilson WE J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 2():S2-10. PubMed ID: 18079760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error. Fung KY; Krewski D J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology. Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A measurement error model for time-series studies of air pollution and mortality. Dominici F; Zeger SL; Samet JM Biostatistics; 2000 Jun; 1(2):157-75. PubMed ID: 12933517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias in the estimation of exposure effects with individual- or group-based exposure assessment. Kim HM; Richardson D; Loomis D; Van Tongeren M; Burstyn I J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2011; 21(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 20179749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure. Brenner H; Loomis D Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 7986865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement error in environmental epidemiology and the shape of exposure-response curves. Rhomberg LR; Chandalia JK; Long CM; Goodman JE Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 41(8):651-71. PubMed ID: 21823979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement error in air pollution exposure assessment. Navidi W; Lurmann F J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1995; 5(2):111-24. PubMed ID: 7492901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two dimensions of measurement error: classical and Berkson error in residential radon exposure assessment. Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Miles J; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 14(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15361895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shared uncertainty in measurement error problems, with application to Nevada Test Site fallout data. Li Y; Guolo A; Hoffman FO; Carroll RJ Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1226-36. PubMed ID: 18078484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution. Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian method for improving logistic regression estimates under group-based exposure assessment with additive measurement errors. Kim HM; Burstyn I Arch Environ Occup Health; 2009; 64(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 20007122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of particulate and gas exposures of sensitive subpopulations living in Baltimore and Boston. Koutrakis P; Suh HH; Sarnat JA; Brown KW; Coull BA; Schwartz J Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2005 Dec; (131):1-65; discussion 67-75. PubMed ID: 16541849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consequences of exposure measurement error for confounder identification in environmental epidemiology. Budtz-Jørgensen E; Keiding N; Grandjean P; Weihe P; White RF Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3089-100. PubMed ID: 12973789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating effects of ambient PM(2.5) exposure on health using PM(2.5) component measurements and regression calibration. Strand M; Vedal S; Rodes C; Dutton SJ; Gelfand EW; Rabinovitch N J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 16007115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Controlling for confounding in the presence of measurement error in hierarchical models: a Bayesian approach. Gryparis A; Coull BA; Schwartz J J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 2():S20-8. PubMed ID: 18079761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models. Freedman LS; Fainberg V; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Carroll RJ Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 15032787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error. Guo Y; Little RJ; McConnell DS Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 22157312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]