852 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20574093)
1. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy.
van Werven JR; Marsman HA; Nederveen AJ; Smits NJ; ten Kate FJ; van Gulik TM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):159-68. PubMed ID: 20574093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hepatic steatosis in living liver donor candidates: preoperative assessment by using breath-hold triple-echo MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy.
Hwang I; Lee JM; Lee KB; Yoon JH; Kiefer B; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):730-8. PubMed ID: 24533869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hepatic steatosis in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery: assessment with open-system 1H-MR spectroscopy.
van Werven JR; Schreuder TC; Aarts EO; Nederveen AJ; Meijer JW; Berends FJ; Janssen IM; Mulder CJ; Jansen PL; Stoker J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):W736-42. PubMed ID: 21606262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance for quantitative assessment of liver steatosis: a new potential tool to monitor antiretroviral-drug-related toxicities.
Guaraldi G; Besutti G; Stentarelli C; Zona S; Nocetti L; Loria P; Ballestri S; Losi L; Torricelli P; Ligabue G
Antivir Ther; 2012; 17(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 22766513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy.
Idilman IS; Aniktar H; Idilman R; Kabacam G; Savas B; Elhan A; Celik A; Bahar K; Karcaaltincaba M
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):767-75. PubMed ID: 23382293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Braga HJ; Choti MA; Lee VS; Paulson EK; Siegelman ES; Bluemke DA
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 11997563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations.
Lee SS; Park SH; Kim HJ; Kim SY; Kim MY; Kim DY; Suh DJ; Kim KM; Bae MH; Lee JY; Lee SG; Yu ES
J Hepatol; 2010 Apr; 52(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 20185194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of hepatic steatosis: a comparison of the accuracy among multiple magnetic resonance techniques.
Wu CH; Ho MC; Jeng YM; Hsu CY; Liang PC; Hu RH; Lai HS; Shih TT
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):807-13. PubMed ID: 24224538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of liver fat content: comparison of triple-echo chemical shift gradient-echo imaging and in vivo proton MR spectroscopy.
Guiu B; Petit JM; Loffroy R; Ben Salem D; Aho S; Masson D; Hillon P; Krause D; Cercueil JP
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 19092092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings.
Aydin H; Kizilgöz V; Tatar IG; Damar C; Ugan AR; Paker I; Hekimoğlu B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 22261768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility and accuracy of dual-source dual-energy CT for noninvasive determination of hepatic iron accumulation.
Joe E; Kim SH; Lee KB; Jang JJ; Lee JY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22106352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hepatic lipid composition analysis using 3.0-T MR spectroscopy in a steatotic rat model.
van Werven JR; Marsman HA; Nederveen AJ; ten Kate FJ; van Gulik TM; Stoker J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 30(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 21940131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hepatic fat quantification: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and analysis methods for chemical-shift gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging with histologic assessment as the reference standard.
Kang BK; Yu ES; Lee SS; Lee Y; Kim N; Sirlin CB; Cho EY; Yeom SK; Byun JH; Park SH; Lee MG
Invest Radiol; 2012 Jun; 47(6):368-75. PubMed ID: 22543969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hepatic macrosteatosis: predicting appropriateness of liver donation by using MR imaging--correlation with histopathologic findings.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Han JK; Lee JY; Lee KH; Han CJ; Jo JY; Yi NJ; Suh KS; Shin KS; Jo SY; Choi BI
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):116-29. PubMed ID: 16684918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of hepatic steatosis using dual-energy CT with MR comparison.
Sun T; Lin X; Chen K
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed); 2014 Jun; 19(8):1377-85. PubMed ID: 24896357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of liver fat quantification at MR imaging: comparison of out-of-phase gradient-echo and fat-saturated fast spin-echo techniques--initial experience.
Qayyum A; Goh JS; Kakar S; Yeh BM; Merriman RB; Coakley FV
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):507-11. PubMed ID: 16244259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of hepatic steatosis: a comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance indices in candidates for living liver donation.
Maruzzelli L; Parr AJ; Miraglia R; Tuzzolino F; Luca A
Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 24594420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 3.0-T MR study.
Guiu B; Petit JM; Capitan V; Aho S; Masson D; Lefevre PH; Favelier S; Loffroy R; Vergès B; Hillon P; Krausé D; Cercueil JP
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 22843768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liver steatosis quantification using magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective comparative study with liver biopsy.
Mennesson N; Dumortier J; Hervieu V; Milot L; Guillaud O; Scoazec JY; Pilleul F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):672-7. PubMed ID: 19820490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
