These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20574933)

  • 1. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impaired task switching performance in children with dyslexia but not in children with autism.
    Poljac E; Simon S; Ringlever L; Kalcik D; Groen WB; Buitelaar JK; Bekkering H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):401-16. PubMed ID: 19565430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: the role of mediator retrieval.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):347-63. PubMed ID: 16569151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of articulatory suppression on cue-switch and task-switch trials in random task cueing with 2:1 mapping.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1599-614. PubMed ID: 22506894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts.
    Hsieh S; Wu M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1423():41-52. PubMed ID: 22000079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cue-task associations in task switching.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 17514592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individuals with schizophrenia present hypo- and hyperactivation during implicit cueing in an inhibitory task.
    Arce E; Leland DS; Miller DA; Simmons AN; Winternheimer KC; Paulus MP
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):704-13. PubMed ID: 16766210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic influences from a brief peripheral cue depend on task set.
    Weaver MD; Phillips J; Lauwereyns J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1249-55. PubMed ID: 20419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of the asymmetrical "local" switch cost: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Martin CD; Barcelo F; Hernandez M; Costa A
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Mar; 86(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 21167903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual flicker in the gamma-band range does not draw attention.
    van Diepen RM; Born S; Souto D; Gauch A; Kerzel D
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 103(3):1606-13. PubMed ID: 20089822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signaling a switch: neural correlates of task switching guided by task cues and transition cues.
    West R; Langley MM; Bailey K
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):612-23. PubMed ID: 20840196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.