These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2057515)

  • 1. Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization.
    Hooks MS; Jones GH; Smith AD; Neill DB; Justice JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1991 Feb; 38(2):467-70. PubMed ID: 2057515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects.
    Hooks MS; Jones GH; Neill DB; Justice JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Jan; 41(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 1539070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dopamine transporter, but not tyrosine hydroxylase, may be implicated in determining individual differences in behavioral sensitization to amphetamine.
    Dietz DM; Tapocik J; Gaval-Cruz M; Kabbaj M
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Oct; 86(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 16126238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine infusions.
    Hooks MS; Jones GH; Liem BJ; Justice JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Nov; 43(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 1448477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine.
    Hooks MS; Jones GH; Smith AD; Neill DB; Justice JB
    Synapse; 1991 Oct; 9(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 1821483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in cocaine- and amphetamine-induced activation of male Sprague-Dawley rats: contribution of the dopamine transporter.
    Briegleb SK; Gulley JM; Hoover BR; Zahniser NR
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2004 Dec; 29(12):2168-79. PubMed ID: 15292903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. I. Expression of morphine-induced locomotor sensitization.
    Kalinichev M; White DA; Holtzman SG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Dec; 177(1-2):61-7. PubMed ID: 15316716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug.
    Pierre PJ; Vezina P
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Feb; 129(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 9084067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-conditioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning.
    Kosten TA; Miserendino MJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Aug; 60(4):785-91. PubMed ID: 9700959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estradiol enhances behavioral sensitization to cocaine and amphetamine-stimulated striatal [3H]dopamine release.
    Peris J; Decambre N; Coleman-Hardee ML; Simpkins JW
    Brain Res; 1991 Dec; 566(1-2):255-64. PubMed ID: 1814541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization is modulated by environmental stimuli.
    Fraioli S; Crombag HS; Badiani A; Robinson TE
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 1999 Jun; 20(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 10327423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis.
    Hooks MS; Colvin AC; Juncos JL; Justice JB
    Brain Res; 1992 Aug; 587(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 1525663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of amphetamine- and methamphetamine-induced locomotor activity in rats: evidence for qualitative differences in behavior.
    Hall DA; Stanis JJ; Marquez Avila H; Gulley JM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2008 Jan; 195(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 17874316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats.
    Gong W; Neill DB; Justice JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1996 Jan; 53(1):185-90. PubMed ID: 8848449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in behavioral reactivity: correlation with stress-induced norepinephrine efflux in the hippocampus of Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Rosario LA; Abercrombie ED
    Brain Res Bull; 1999 Apr; 48(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 10386839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age and sex differences in the locomotor effect of repeated methylphenidate in rats classified as high or low novelty responders.
    Wooters TE; Dwoskin LP; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Sep; 188(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 16896959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No major differences in locomotor responses to dexamphetamine in high and low responders to novelty: a study in Wistar rats.
    Gingras MA; Cools AR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Aug; 57(4):857-62. PubMed ID: 9259016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does locomotor response to novelty in rats predict susceptibility to develop sensitization to cocaine and PHNO?
    Djano S; Martin-Iverson MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2000 Sep; 11(6):455-70. PubMed ID: 11103912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine.
    Bevins RA; Peterson JL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2004 Sep; 79(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 15388285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of a novel environment on alcohol-induced locomotor activity in Wistar rats.
    Hernández-Vázquez F; Reyes-Guzmán C; Méndez M
    Alcohol; 2018 Sep; 71():5-13. PubMed ID: 29929089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.