BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2057594)

  • 1. [Stage I and II cervical carcinoma. Study with magnetic resonance and transrectal echography].
    Tipaldi L; Squillaci E; Cecconi L; Lombardi A; Marsella A; Vincenzoni C; Crecco M; Squillaci S
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):666-70. PubMed ID: 2057594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experience with the combined diagnosis and therapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage FIGO IIB-III). Transrectal ultrasonography and CT in the staging and in follow-up after therapy. Preliminary results].
    Marano P; Summaria V; Smaniotto D; Danza FM; Speca S; Valentini AL; Greggi S; Lancia M; Cellini N
    Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 8272550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer.
    Fischerova D; Cibula D; Stenhova H; Vondrichova H; Calda P; Zikan M; Freitag P; Slama J; Dundr P; Belacek J
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 17892456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Staging of cervical cancer: reliability of transrectal US.
    Innocenti P; Pulli F; Savino L; Nicolucci A; Pandimiglio A; Menchi I; Massi G
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):201-5. PubMed ID: 1523308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tumour size as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the cervix: assessment by transrectal ultrasound.
    Magee BJ; Logue JP; Swindell R; McHugh D
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Sep; 64(765):812-5. PubMed ID: 1913045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stage IB cervical carcinoma: comparison of clinical, MR, and pathologic staging.
    Rubens D; Thornbury JR; Angel C; Stoler MH; Weiss SL; Lerner RM; Beecham J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jan; 150(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 3257111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Yang WT; Walkden SB; Ho S; Cheung TH; Lam SK; Teo J; Metreweli C
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):610-6. PubMed ID: 8696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of CTV
    Mendez LC; Ravi A; Martell K; Raziee H; Alayed Y; Wronski M; Paudel M; Barnes E; Taggar A; Wong CS; Leung E
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Apr; 15(1):73. PubMed ID: 32252792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
    Yamamoto K; Kitao M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of early-stage cervical cancer].
    Fischerová D; Cibula D; Stenhová H; Vondrichová H; Zikán M; Freitag P; Sláma J; Pavlsta D; Pinkavová I; Dundr P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Oct; 74(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 20063834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
    Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
    Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
    Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of imaging features and diagnostic values of MRI, CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma staging.
    Yu L; Zhang HF; Jiang DW; Zhao DY; Liu H; Shen LM
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2018 Aug; 22(15):4784-4791. PubMed ID: 30070310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
    Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
    Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
    Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
    Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal endocavitary ultrasound versus MRI and clinical findings in pre- and post-treatment advanced cervical cancer. Preliminary report.
    Csutak C; Badea R; Bolboaca SD; Ordeanu C; Nagy VM; Fekete Z; Chiorean L; Dudea SM
    Med Ultrason; 2016 Mar; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 26962558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of parametrial involvement in carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
    Fischetti SG; Coppolino F; Priolo GD; Chiarenza R; Garufi A; Privitera G; Materazzo S; Loreto C
    Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 1767055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic factors for local and distant recurrence in stage I and II cervical carcinoma.
    Werner-Wasik M; Schmid CH; Bornstein L; Ball HG; Smith DM; Madoc-Jones H
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jul; 32(5):1309-17. PubMed ID: 7635770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.