172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2057595)
1. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical stage I carcinoma of the cervix. Value of MR imaging in determining invasion into the parametrium.
Lien HH; Blomlie V; Iversen T; Tropé C; Sundfør K; Abeler VM
Acta Radiol; 1993 Mar; 34(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 8452717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of parametrial involvement in carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Fischetti SG; Coppolino F; Priolo GD; Chiarenza R; Garufi A; Privitera G; Materazzo S; Loreto C
Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 1767055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
Yamamoto K; Kitao M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stage IB cervical carcinoma: comparison of clinical, MR, and pathologic staging.
Rubens D; Thornbury JR; Angel C; Stoler MH; Weiss SL; Lerner RM; Beecham J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jan; 150(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 3257111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P
Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical carcinoma with full-thickness stromal invasion: efficacy of dynamic MR imaging in the assessment of parametrial involvement.
Iwata S; Joja I; Okuno K; Miyagi Y; Sakaguchi Y; Kudo T; Hiraki Y
Radiat Med; 2002; 20(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 12450104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement of two-dimensional and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer.
Chiappa V; Di Legge A; Valentini AL; Gui B; Miccò M; Ludovisi M; Giansiracusa C; Testa AC; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 25091827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging.
Togashi K; Nishimura K; Sagoh T; Minami S; Noma S; Fujisawa I; Nakano Y; Konishi J; Ozasa H; Konishi I
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 2928532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
