172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2057595)
21. Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Marincek B; Devaud MC; Triller J; Fuchs WA
Eur J Radiol; 1984 May; 4(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6734609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How important is removal of the parametrium at surgery for carcinoma of the cervix?
Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Jan; 84(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 11748991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI.
Kaji Y; Sugimura K; Kitao M; Ishida T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 8089330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Role of X-ray computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma].
Kojima Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 41(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 2732565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma.
Walsh JW; Goplerud DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Value of computerized tomography for the assessment of the parametrium in cervical cancer].
Räber G; Pötzschke B
Rofo; 1985 Nov; 143(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 2999892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Experience with the combined diagnosis and therapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage FIGO IIB-III). Transrectal ultrasonography and CT in the staging and in follow-up after therapy. Preliminary results].
Marano P; Summaria V; Smaniotto D; Danza FM; Speca S; Valentini AL; Greggi S; Lancia M; Cellini N
Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 8272550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computed tomographic evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix.
Whitley NO; Brenner DE; Francis A; Villa Santa U; Aisner J; Wiernik PH; Whitley J
Radiology; 1982 Feb; 142(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 7054834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study.
Choi SH; Kim SH; Choi HJ; Park BK; Lee HJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 15480035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Value of magnetic resonance imaging with an endovaginal receiver coil in the pre-operative assessment of Stage I and IIa cervical neoplasia.
deSouza NM; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP; Krausz T; Chui KM; Hughes C; Mason WP
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 May; 105(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 9637118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of parametrial invasion of carcinoma of the cervix uteri: optimization of the study protocol].
Sironi S; Villa G; Rossi S; Bocciolone L; Maggioni A; Sonzogni A; Bellomi M
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):477-84. PubMed ID: 11479445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Hematometra in patients with cervical cancer--its CT presentation and clinical significance].
Hsu SM; Pan HB; Kan YY; Chang JM; Yang CF
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Feb; 51(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 8385551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Problem of pretherapeutic staging of cervical carcinoma. Studies of the diagnostic value of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with gynecologic palpation findings and pathologic-anatomic diagnosis].
Zapf S; Halbsguth A; Schweden F; Klose K; Lochner B; Beck T; Friese K; Kreienberg R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Dec; 47(12):838-42. PubMed ID: 3436507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computed tomography in invasive carcinoma of the cervix: an appraisal.
Villasanta U; Whitley NO; Haney PJ; Brenner D
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 6866364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Carcinoma of the uterine cervical canal. Staging and biometric assessment with magnetic resonance].
Fischetti SG; Politi G; Lomeo E; Garozzo G; Di Leo S; Nuciforo G
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 7997618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma.
Boss EA; Barentsz JO; Massuger LF; Boonstra H
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 10663755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
