These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20576126)
1. Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis. Park JH; Woo JH; Shim SH; Yang SJ; Choi YM; Yang KS; Cha DH BMC Med Genet; 2010 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 20576126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics. Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Mar; 37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20494259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hillman SC; Pretlove S; Coomarasamy A; McMullan DJ; Davison EV; Maher ER; Kilby MD Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20658510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Genomic abnormalities in children with mental retardation and autism: the use of comparative genomic hybridization in situ (HRCGH) and molecular karyotyping with DNA-microchips (array CGH)]. Vorsanova SG; Iurov IIu; Kurinnaia OS; Voinova VIu; Iurov IuB Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 2013; 113(8):46-9. PubMed ID: 24077551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis. Levy B; Wapner R Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 29447663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Schaeffer AJ; Chung J; Heretis K; Wong A; Ledbetter DH; Lese Martin C Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1168-74. PubMed ID: 15127362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Coppinger J; Alliman S; Lamb AN; Torchia BS; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG Prenat Diagn; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19795450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization for the Diagnosis of DiGeorge Syndrome in Saudi Arabian Population. Bahamat AA; Assidi M; Lary SA; Almughamsi MM; Peer Zada AA; Chaudhary A; Abuzenadah A; Abu-Elmagd M; Al-Qahtani M Cytogenet Genome Res; 2018; 154(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 29455205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of the diagnostic value of chromosome analysis and bacterial artificial chromosome-based array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Savli H; Keskin SE; Cine N Turk J Med Sci; 2015; 45(6):1263-7. PubMed ID: 26775380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of three chromosomal abnormalities with favorable outcomes. Chen Q; Xu Z; Chen G; Liu S; Xia Y Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 59(2):338-341. PubMed ID: 32127162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatally diagnosed de novo segmental amplification or deletion by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization: A retrospective study. Peng HH; Lee CH; Su SY; Chen KJ; Lee YC; You SH; Lee WF; Cheng PJ Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 58(5):662-666. PubMed ID: 31542089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing. Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oligonucleotide arrays vs. metaphase-comparative genomic hybridisation and BAC arrays for single-cell analysis: first applications to preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Robertsonian translocation carriers. Ramos L; del Rey J; Daina G; García-Aragonés M; Armengol L; Fernandez-Encinas A; Parriego M; Boada M; Martinez-Passarell O; Martorell MR; Casagran O; Benet J; Navarro J PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113223. PubMed ID: 25415307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative genomic hybridization and prenatal diagnosis. Van den Veyver IB; Beaudet AL Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 18(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 16601480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases. Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization technique in genetic analysis of patients with spontaneous abortion]. Chu Y; Wu D; Hou QF; Huo XD; Gao Y; Wang T; Wang HD; Yang YL; Liao SX Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 27561938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective study of the clinical utility of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and an exploration of a framework for reporting unclassified variants and risk factors. Brady PD; Delle Chiaie B; Christenhusz G; Dierickx K; Van Den Bogaert K; Menten B; Janssens S; Defoort P; Roets E; Sleurs E; Keymolen K; De Catte L; Deprest J; de Ravel T; Van Esch H; Fryns JP; Devriendt K; Vermeesch JR Genet Med; 2014 Jun; 16(6):469-76. PubMed ID: 24177055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]