These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20576403)

  • 21. Effects of local simvastatin on periosteal distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
    Kahraman OE; Erdogan Ö; Namli H; Sencar L
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):e18-22. PubMed ID: 25640700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Histomorphometric analysis of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
    Lawler ME; Tayebaty FT; Williams WB; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20561467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis.
    Rachmiel A; Srouji S; Peled M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 30(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 11829233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Osteogenic capacities of tibial and cranial periosteum: a biochemical and histologic study.
    Bilkay U; Tokat C; Helvaci E; Ozek C; Zekioglu O; Onat T; Songur E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 18362726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The potential for vertical bone regeneration via maxillary periosteal elevation.
    Mouraret S; Von Kaeppler E; Bardet C; Hunter DJ; Chaussain C; Bouchard P; Helms JA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Dec; 41(12):1170-7. PubMed ID: 25229322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Repair osteogenesis during limb elongation using transosseous distraction osteosynthesis].
    Ir'ianov IuM; Ir'ianova TIu
    Morfologiia; 2003; 123(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 12942834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Periosteum-Induced Bone Formation by Distraction Osteogenesis: Histologic and Microcomputed Tomography Analysis.
    Nakahara K; Haga-Tsujimura M; Iizuka T; Saulacic N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 27447143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A minipig model of maxillary distraction osteogenesis.
    Papadaki ME; Troulis MJ; Glowacki J; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2783-91. PubMed ID: 20971370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Periosteal elevation induces supracortical peri-implant bone formation.
    Lutz R; Sendlbeck C; Wahabzada H; Tudor C; Prechtl C; Schlegel KA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1170-1178. PubMed ID: 28606438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implant placement for periosteal expansion osteogenesis using beta-tricalcium phosphate block: an experimental study in dogs.
    Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Funaki K; Miyamoto I; Yamashita Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 19766024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of periosteal coverage on distraction osteogenesis with dental implant distractors.
    Yin X; Zhang C; Hze-Khoong EP; Wang Y; Xu L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1921-7. PubMed ID: 25234527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bone regeneration and fracture healing. Experience with distraction osteogenesis model.
    Richards M; Goulet JA; Weiss JA; Waanders NA; Schaffler MB; Goldstein SA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355 Suppl):S191-204. PubMed ID: 9917639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Histochemical evidence of the initial chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in the periosteum of a rib fractured model: implications of osteocyte involvement in periosteal chondrogenesis.
    Li M; Amizuka N; Oda K; Tokunaga K; Ito T; Takeuchi K; Takagi R; Maeda T
    Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Jul; 64(4):330-42. PubMed ID: 15481050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sinus floor augmentation with recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5 (rhGDF-5): a pilot study in the Goettingen miniature pig comparing autogenous bone and rhGDF-5.
    Gruber RM; Ludwig A; Merten HA; Pippig S; Kramer FJ; Schliephake H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 19077151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effect of Decortication for Periosteal Expansion Osteogenesis Using Shape Memory Alloy Mesh Device.
    Yamauchi K; Nogami S; Tanaka K; Yokota S; Shimizu Y; Kanetaka H; Takahashi T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e376-84. PubMed ID: 25066502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of distraction forces and frequency of distraction on bony regeneration.
    Kessler P; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 43(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 16026911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Regeneration of the mandibular condyle in minipigs.
    Zouhary KJ; Feinberg SE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):565-6; author reply 566. PubMed ID: 16487827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of osteogenic potential of calvarial bone dust, bone fragments, and periosteum.
    Gupta A; Lobocki C; Malhotra G; Jackson IT
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 20(6):1995-9. PubMed ID: 19881377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vascular proliferation and blood supply during distraction osteogenesis: a scanning electron microscopic observation.
    Choi IH; Ahn JH; Chung CY; Cho TJ
    J Orthop Res; 2000 Sep; 18(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 11117289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Onlay bone grafting of the mandible after periosteal expansion with an osmotic tissue expander: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Abrahamsson P; Isaksson S; Gordh M; Andersson G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1404-10. PubMed ID: 20637032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.