These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20576403)

  • 41. [Distraction osteogenesis of the cranio-maxillo-facial bones].
    Scopelliti D; Orsini R; Ventucci E; Verdino G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2000; 49(7-8):355-68. PubMed ID: 11234688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Histomorphometric comparison between continuous and discontinuous distraction osteogenesis.
    Djasim UM; Mathot BJ; Wolvius EB; van Neck JW; van der Wal KG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):398-404. PubMed ID: 19457679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Distraction osteogenesis in an anterior mandibular bone defect utilizing lingual periosteal release: a case report.
    Gellrich NC; Suarez-Cunqueiro MM; Schön R; Hoffmann M; Schramm A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):753-7. PubMed ID: 15508994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of latency period in a rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Aida T; Yoshioka I; Tominaga K; Fukuda J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 32(1):54-62; discussion 63. PubMed ID: 12653234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Influence of stripping periosteum on bone formation in guided tissue regeneration].
    Zhang H; Lu S; Wang J
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1998 May; 36(5):278-80, 60. PubMed ID: 11825388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: Experimental studies.
    Swennen G; Dempf R; Schliephake H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 12102408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effects of osteoformin on mineralisation and quality of newly formed bone during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
    Pampu AA; Ozkaynak O; Senel FC; Cankaya M; Dolanmaz D; Ersöz S; Avunduk MC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):833-7. PubMed ID: 19828342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of bone formation ingrafted periosteum harvested from tibia and calvaria.
    Fujii T; Ueno T; Kagawa T; Sakata Y; Sugahara T
    Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Jul; 69(7):580-4. PubMed ID: 16718663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in an experimental model.
    Cheung LK; Zheng LW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):100-8; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 16432416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relative contributions of osteogenic tissues to new bone formation in periosteal distraction osteogenesis: histological and histomorphometrical evaluation in a rat calvaria.
    Saulacic N; Hug C; Bosshardt DD; Schaller B; Buser D; Haeniwa H; Iizuka T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):692-706. PubMed ID: 22098938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Recombinant growth hormone increasus callus maturation time in distraction osteogenesis--a histomorphometric study].
    Bail H; Raschke MJ; Kolbeck SF; Weiler A; Haahr PM; Haas NP
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1998; 115(Suppl I):675-80. PubMed ID: 14518340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Osteogenic potential of cultured human periosteum-derived cells - a pilot study of human cell transplantation into a rat calvarial defect model.
    Sakata Y; Ueno T; Kagawa T; Kanou M; Fujii T; Yamachika E; Sugahara T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 34(8):461-5. PubMed ID: 17157522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Self-activated mesh device using shape memory alloy for periosteal expansion osteogenesis.
    Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Tanaka K; Nogami S; Kaneuji T; Kanetaka H; Miyazaki T; Lethaus B; Kessler P
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Jul; 101(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23359561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis: An Effective Method for Bone Regeneration.
    Zhao D; Wang Y; Han D
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():2075317. PubMed ID: 28078283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Alveolar width distraction osteogenesis for early implant placement.
    Laster Z; Rachmiel A; Jensen OT
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1724-30. PubMed ID: 16297692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pumping the Periosteum: A Feasibility Study.
    Saulacic N; Vunjak-Novakovic G; Haga-Tsujimura M; Nakahara K; Gerbaix MC; Ferrari SL
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 89(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 35276708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible with a modified intraoral appliance: a pilot study in miniature pigs.
    Holzhauer DP; Larsen PE; Miloro M; Vig KW
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 9835823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Effects of pollution with fluoride on bone dynamics of periosteum in iliac of domestic pigs].
    Zhang X; Qiu MC; Liu WB
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Nov; 28(6):360-2. PubMed ID: 7867457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Bone regeneration and limb lengthening.
    Merloz P
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Jun; 22(6):2033-6. PubMed ID: 21523394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of a biodegradable novel periosteal distractor.
    Zakaria O; Kon K; Kasugai S
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2012 Apr; 100(3):882-9. PubMed ID: 21998069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.