BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2057683)

  • 1. Letting patients die.
    Mattera MD
    RN; 1991 Jul; 54(7):7. PubMed ID: 2057683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Family role in health care decision making.
    Lynn J
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 8453245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond patient advocacy.
    Reifsynder J
    Imprint; 2000; 47(5):56-7, 63. PubMed ID: 12492088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical dilemmas in artificial nutrition and hydration: food for thought.
    White KS; Hall JC
    Nurs Case Manag; 1999; 4(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 10232221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In re Jane Doe.
    Barkow JM
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):243-4. PubMed ID: 2621096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The family in medical decisionmaking.
    Blustein J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(3):6-13. PubMed ID: 8496054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning from Amy. A remarkable patient provokes anguished debate about rationality, autonomy and the right to die.
    Cameron S
    CMAJ; 1997 Jan; 156(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 9012727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right to die--ethical dilemmas in persons with spinal cord injury.
    Rundquist JM
    SCI Nurs; 2002; 19(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 12510497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision making about medical innovation: the role of the advocate.
    Rouse F
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):607-16. PubMed ID: 11652856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Patient's instruction: I do not want a physician--I want to die].
    Haarhaus F
    Pflege Z; 2000 Apr; 53(4):246-9. PubMed ID: 10969570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deciding for others.
    Meisel A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):48-9. PubMed ID: 2228590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whose life is it?
    Abruzzese R
    Decubitus; 1992 Jul; 5(4):6. PubMed ID: 1497809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advocating for the dying: the view of family and friends.
    Moretti A
    Bioethics Forum; 1997; 13(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 11655286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cruzan: clear and convincing? Missouri stands alone.
    Colby WH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 2121666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Durable power of attorney for health care decision.
    Luckert MJ
    Kans Med; 1990 May; 91(5):138-41. PubMed ID: 2370735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
    Reckling JB
    Medsurg Nurs; 1995 Aug; 4(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 7627242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
    Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
    Rushton CH; Hogue EE
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The living will: does it protect the rights of the terminally ill?
    Rizzo RF
    N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 2710437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The death of an innocent.
    Fontanilla L
    Hawaii Med J; 1997 Mar; 56(3):59-60. PubMed ID: 9108715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.