132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20578017)
1. Robust segmentation of mass-lesions in contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MR images.
Meinel LA; Buelow T; Huo D; Shimauchi A; Kose U; Buurman J; Newstead G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 20578017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16399033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and evaluation of a semiautomatic segmentation method for the estimation of LV parameters on cine MR images.
Mazonakis M; Grinias E; Pagonidis K; Tziritas G; Damilakis J
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1127-40. PubMed ID: 20107252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Malignant lesion segmentation in contrast-enhanced breast MR images based on the marker-controlled watershed.
Cui Y; Tan Y; Zhao B; Liberman L; Parbhu R; Kaplan J; Theodoulou M; Hudis C; Schwartz LH
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4359-69. PubMed ID: 19928066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Freehand MRI-guided preoperative needle localization of breast lesions after MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy without marker placement.
van de Ven SM; Lin MC; Daniel BL; Sareen P; Lipson JA; Pal S; Dirbas FM; Ikeda DM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 20575077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast lesion analysis of shape technique: semiautomated vs. manual morphological description.
Liney GP; Sreenivas M; Gibbs P; Garcia-Alvarez R; Turnbull LW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 16523479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
Cheung HS; Tse GM; Lai SY; Yeung DK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Segmentation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) lesions in MR images.
Lee FK; Yeung DK; King AD; Leung SF; Ahuja A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Feb; 61(2):608-20. PubMed ID: 15667983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of manual and automatic segmentation of the mouse heart from CINE MR images.
Heijman E; Aben JP; Penners C; Niessen P; Guillaume R; van Eys G; Nicolay K; Strijkers GJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18050352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved lesion detection in MR mammography: three-dimensional segmentation, moving voxel sampling, and normalized maximum intensity-time ratio entropy.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Tunaci M
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 17236988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic glioma characterization from dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging: brain tumor segmentation using knowledge-based fuzzy clustering.
Emblem KE; Nedregaard B; Hald JK; Nome T; Due-Tonnessen P; Bjornerud A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19557840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
