138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20578659)
1. Repairing collagen in dentin carious lesions. Influence of sealing the material: a morphometric study.
Pinheiro SL; Gallassi PC; Saldanha TC; Bincelli IN; Barros PP; Silva GH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 20578659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals.
Li XJ; Zhao SJ; Niu LN; Tay FR; Jiao K; Gao Y; Chen JH
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 24200871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
Smith ED; Martin FE
Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oral Function Improves Interfacial Integrity and Sealing Ability Between Conventional Glass Ionomer Cements and Dentin.
Toledano M; Osorio R; Cabello I; Osorio E; Toledano-Osorio M; Aguilera FS
Microsc Microanal; 2017 Feb; 23(1):131-144. PubMed ID: 28148310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sealing and dentin bond strength of adhesive systems in selected areas of perfused teeth.
Escribano N; Del-Nero O; de la Macorra JC
Dent Mater; 2001 Mar; 17(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11163385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Wang L; Sakai VT; Kawai ES; Buzalaf MA; Atta MT
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin.
Burrow MF; Nopnakeepong U; Phrukkanon S
Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 11823016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microtensile Bond Strength Between Glass Ionomer Cement and Silver Diamine Fluoride-Treated Carious Primary Dentin.
Puwanawiroj A; Trairatvorakul C; Dasanayake AP; Auychai P
Pediatr Dent; 2018 Jul; 40(4):291-295. PubMed ID: 30345969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to caries-affected dentin.
Palma-Dibb RG; de Castro CG; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 12729084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of sealing vs tensile bond strength of eight adhesive restorative material systems.
Del-Nero MO; Escribano N; de la Macorra JC
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 11317399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No adverse effect to bonding following caries disinfection with chlorhexidine.
Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Eronat C; Belli S
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19341575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate on bond strength of a glass-fibre post luted with resin or glass-ionomer based cement.
de Araújo DF; Chaves LP; Bim O; Pimentel Garcia FC; Ishikiriama SK; Honório HM; Wang L
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 24613604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
