These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20578851)

  • 1. Mechanical properties of self-drilling orthodontic micro-implants with different diameters.
    Chen Y; Kyung HM; Gao L; Yu WJ; Bae EJ; Kim SM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):821-7. PubMed ID: 20578851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of commonly used self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Smith A; Hosein YK; Dunning CE; Tassi A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24869900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy.
    Barros SE; Janson G; Chiqueto K; Garib DG; Janson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e181-92. PubMed ID: 21967956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peak insertion torque values of five mini-implant systems under different insertion loads.
    Quraishi E; Sherriff M; Bister D
    J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 24521745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of anchorage systems for micro implant orthodontics.
    Favero L; Giagnorio C; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 20974447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Wilmes B; Panayotidis A; Drescher D
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 21310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 21536211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insertion Torques of Self-Drilling Mini-Implants in Simulated Mandibular Bone: Assessment of Potential for Implant Fracture.
    Hosein YK; Smith A; Dunning CE; Tassi A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):e57-64. PubMed ID: 27183083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical stability and clinical applicability assessment of novel orthodontic mini-implant design.
    Song HN; Hong C; Banh R; Ohebsion T; Asatrian G; Leung HY; Wu BM; Moon W
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):832-41. PubMed ID: 23627420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of insertion angle and implant thread type on the fracture properties of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion.
    Cho IS; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 23216058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of thread depth, taper shape, and taper length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Chang JZ; Chen YJ; Tung YY; Chiang YY; Lai EH; Chen WP; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 22381488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Insertion torque versus mechanical resistance of mini-implants inserted in different cortical thickness.
    Santos RF; Ruellas AC; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):90-4. PubMed ID: 25162571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.
    Brown RN; Sexton BE; Gabriel Chu TM; Katona TR; Stewart KT; Kyung HM; Liu SS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 24703288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain of bone-implant interface and insertion torque regarding different miniscrew thread designs using an artificial bone model.
    Cha JY; Hwang CJ; Kwon SH; Jung HS; Kim KM; Yu HS
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 25296728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Micrographic study and torsional strength of grade 23 titanium mini-implants recycled for orthodontic purposes.
    Kaci N; Hakem K; Laraba S; Benrekaa N; Le Gall M
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 29628423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cortical thickness on the stability of mini-implants with microthreads.
    Vilani GN; Ruellas AC; Mattos CT; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro investigation of peak insertion torque values of six commercially available mini-implants.
    Whang CZ; Bister D; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 21186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.