150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20579240)
1. Burton v. Florida: Maternal-fetal conflicts and medical decision-making during pregnancy.
Wevers K
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):436-40. PubMed ID: 20579240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus?
Cady RF
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Canadian Charter as a barrier to unwanted medical treatment of pregnant women in the interests of the foetus.
Jackman M
Health Law Can; 1993; 14(2):49-58. PubMed ID: 10131254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HIV in pregnancy: interests of the mother and the baby.
Isaacs D; Garsia R; Peat B
J Paediatr Child Health; 2003; 39(1):60-3; discussion 63-6. PubMed ID: 12542816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court-ordered care--a complication of pregnancy to avoid.
Cantor JD
N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(24):2237-40. PubMed ID: 22693994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When pregnant patients refuse interventions.
Tauer CA
AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An upside-down world?
Hewson B
Mod Midwife; 1997 May; 7(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 9224034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Whose body is it, anyway?
Hewson B
Nurs Stand; 1997 May; 11(35):18. PubMed ID: 9239007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesareans and Samaritans.
Rhoden NK
Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 3695574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion, disability, assent, and consent.
Häyry M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2001; 10(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 11326790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court-ordered cesareans--choice or control?
Rowan C
Nurs Ethics; 1998 Nov; 5(6):542-4. PubMed ID: 9856072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
Hyams R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human rights, reproductive freedom, medicine and the law.
McLean SA; Ramsey J
Med Law Int; 2002; 5(4):239-58. PubMed ID: 14983883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court-ordered obstetrical intervention and the rights of a pregnant woman.
Thampapillai D
J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 15957588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
Cahill H
Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maternal smoking during pregnancy: social, medical, and legal perspectives on the conception of a human being.
Birenbaum-Carmeli D
Health Care Women Int; 1995; 16(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 7706141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reply to Sarah Burns.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnant women deserve informed consent too.
Gonen JS
Womens Health Issues; 2002; 12(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11786286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
