BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20580694)

  • 1. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
    Hölig C; Berti S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
    Munka L; Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events.
    Horváth J; Roeber U; Bendixen A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1229():193-203. PubMed ID: 18634759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Birkás E; Winkler I; Gervai J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2009 Jul; 30(7):1157-72. PubMed ID: 18023507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation.
    Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 18346043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants.
    Jankowiak S; Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 17241142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 20064580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction.
    Horváth J; Maess B; Berti S; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 18287943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
    Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?
    Horváth J; Winkler I; Bendixen A
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18468765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: a combined behavioral-event-related potential study.
    Reiche M; Hartwigsen G; Widmann A; Saur D; Schröger E; Bendixen A
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1490():153-60. PubMed ID: 23123705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of significance of auditory location changes on event related brain potentials and pitch discrimination performance.
    Koistinen S; Rinne T; Cederström S; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1427():44-53. PubMed ID: 22055456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age dependent changes of distractibility and reorienting of attention revisited: an event-related potential study.
    Berti S; Grunwald M; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1491():156-66. PubMed ID: 23159833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.