292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20581024)
1. Responsibilities of the editor.
Punjabi PP
Perfusion; 2010 May; 25(3):113-4. PubMed ID: 20581024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities?
Kramer MS
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.
Davidoff F; DeAngelis CD; Drazen JM; Nicholls MG; Hoey J; Højgaard L; Horton R; Kotzin S; Nylenna M; Overbeke AJ; Sox HC; Van Der Weyden MB; Wilkes MS
N Engl J Med; 2001 Sep; 345(11):825-6; discussion 826-7. PubMed ID: 11556304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
Kennedy MS
Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Clarke SP
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Working double-blind.
Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7179):605-6. PubMed ID: 18256621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Authors urged to come clean on competing interests.
Knight J
Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6997):280. PubMed ID: 15254501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The manuscript review process.
Triadafilopoulos G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
Bugiardini R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ghostwriting].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(9):1039. PubMed ID: 18451881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A question of ethics--publication policy and animals in research.
Silbergeld E
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):61-2. PubMed ID: 20013505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
Bergström R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
Algase DL
Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can journal editors police animal welfare? Three Es for three Rs in scientific journals.
Marusic A
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):66-7. PubMed ID: 20013508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Geriatrics editorial policy on disclosures.
Sherman FT; Radak JT
Geriatrics; 2006 Sep; 61(9):6. PubMed ID: 16989541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
