These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

931 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20581716)

  • 21. Comparison of two objective monitors for assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviors in bariatric surgery patients.
    Unick JL; Bond DS; Jakicic JM; Vithiananthan S; Ryder BA; Roye GD; Pohl D; Trautvetter J; Wing RR
    Obes Surg; 2012 Mar; 22(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 21814865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
    Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship between accelerometer-determined steps/day and other accelerometer outputs in US adults.
    Tudor-Locke C; Johnson WD; Katzmarzyk PT
    J Phys Act Health; 2011 Mar; 8(3):410-9. PubMed ID: 21487141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Defining Accelerometer Nonwear Time to Maximize Detection of Sedentary Time in Youth.
    Cain KL; Bonilla E; Conway TL; Schipperijn J; Geremia CM; Mignano A; Kerr J; Sallis JF
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2018 May; 30(2):288-295. PubMed ID: 29276859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identifying ActiGraph non-wear time in pregnant women with overweight or obesity.
    Leonard KS; Pauley AM; Hohman EE; Guo P; Rivera DE; Savage JS; Buman MP; Symons Downs D
    J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1197-1201. PubMed ID: 32859522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Real-time estimation of daily physical activity intensity by a triaxial accelerometer and a gravity-removal classification algorithm.
    Ohkawara K; Oshima Y; Hikihara Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tabata I; Tanaka S
    Br J Nutr; 2011 Jun; 105(11):1681-91. PubMed ID: 21262061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimization and Validation of a Classification Algorithm for Assessment of Physical Activity in Hospitalized Patients.
    van Dijk-Huisman HC; Bijnens W; Senden R; Essers JMN; Meijer K; Aarts J; Lenssen AF
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33673447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability of RT3 accelerometers among overweight and obese adults.
    Jerome GJ; Young DR; Laferriere D; Chen C; Vollmer WM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jan; 41(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 19092700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Imputing Accelerometer Nonwear Time When Assessing Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity in Children.
    Borgundvaag E; McIsaac M; Borghese MM; Janssen I
    J Phys Act Health; 2017 Nov; 14(11):852-860. PubMed ID: 28556671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sedentary time in children: influence of accelerometer processing on health relations.
    Atkin AJ; Ekelund U; Møller NC; Froberg K; Sardinha LB; Andersen LB; Brage S
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Jun; 45(6):1097-104. PubMed ID: 23274612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accelerometer adherence and performance in a cohort study of US Hispanic adults.
    Evenson KR; Sotres-Alvarez D; Deng YU; Marshall SJ; Isasi CR; Esliger DW; Davis S
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):725-34. PubMed ID: 25137369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identifying bedrest using 24-h waist or wrist accelerometry in adults.
    Tracy JD; Acra S; Chen KY; Buchowski MS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194461. PubMed ID: 29570740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
    Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determining activity monitor wear time: an influential decision rule.
    King WC; Li J; Leishear K; Mitchell JE; Belle SH
    J Phys Act Health; 2011 May; 8(4):566-80. PubMed ID: 21597130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. U.S. population profile of time-stamped accelerometer outputs: impact of wear time.
    Tudor-Locke C; Johnson WD; Katzmarzyk PT
    J Phys Act Health; 2011 Jul; 8(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 21734315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Actical accelerometer sedentary activity thresholds for adults.
    Wong SL; Colley R; Connor Gorber S; Tremblay M
    J Phys Act Health; 2011 May; 8(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 21597132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions.
    Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer.
    Zhang S; Rowlands AV; Murray P; Hurst TL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 21988935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle.
    Mannini A; Intille SS; Rosenberger M; Sabatini AM; Haskell W
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Nov; 45(11):2193-203. PubMed ID: 23604069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Non-wear or sleep? Evaluation of five non-wear detection algorithms for raw accelerometer data.
    Ahmadi MN; Nathan N; Sutherland R; Wolfenden L; Trost SG
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Feb; 38(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 31826746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.