These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20582147)

  • 1. A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.
    Starns JJ; White CN; Ratcliff R
    J Mem Lang; 2010 Jul; 63(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 20582147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.
    Starns JJ; White CN; Ratcliff R
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1189-99. PubMed ID: 22736423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling list-strength and spacing effects using version 3 of the retrieving effectively from memory (REM.3) model and its superimposition-of-similar-images assumption.
    Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):4-21. PubMed ID: 31898291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R; White CN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1137-51. PubMed ID: 22545609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrieving effectively from source memory: Evidence for differentiation and local matching processes.
    Aytaç S; Kılıç A; Criss AH; Kellen D
    Cogn Psychol; 2024 Mar; 149():101617. PubMed ID: 38183756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytic Expressions for the BCDMEM Model of Recognition Memory.
    Myung JI; Montenegro M; Pitt MA
    J Math Psychol; 2007 Jun; 51(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 18516213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.
    Verde MF; Rotello CM
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Mar; 35(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 17645166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval.
    Lehman M; Malmberg KJ
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):155-89. PubMed ID: 23230891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A differentiation account of recognition memory: evidence from fMRI.
    Criss AH; Wheeler ME; McClelland JL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 25(3):421-35. PubMed ID: 23092213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions.
    Jang Y; Lee H
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):792-815. PubMed ID: 30737728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.
    Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Guitard D; Bireta TJ; Hockley WE; Surprenant AM
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jul; 67(4):255-275. PubMed ID: 33111659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the dynamics of recognition memory testing with an integrated model of retrieval and decision making.
    Osth AF; Jansson A; Dennis S; Heathcote A
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Aug; 104():106-142. PubMed ID: 29778777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm.
    Osth AF; Dennis S
    Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 24317960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.
    Criss AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):484-99. PubMed ID: 20192544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect.
    Criss AH; Aue W; Kılıç A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1910-24. PubMed ID: 24386987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.
    Hockley WE; Niewiadomski MW
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):679-88. PubMed ID: 17848026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.
    Morrell HE; Gaitan S; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1095-110. PubMed ID: 12450335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects during episodic memory encoding.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 15722213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory.
    Starns JJ; Olchowski JE
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 25084988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. List-strength effects in older adults in recognition and free recall.
    Sahakyan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):764-778. PubMed ID: 30607754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.