These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20582556)
1. Preferential superior surface motion in wear simulations of the Charité total disc replacement. Goreham-Voss CM; Vicars R; Hall RM; Brown TD Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S700-8. PubMed ID: 20582556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation. Wilke HJ; Schmidt R; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Reichel H; Cakir B Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S577-84. PubMed ID: 20830492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis. Schmidt H; Galbusera F; Rohlmann A; Zander T; Wilke HJ Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S663-74. PubMed ID: 20361341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of anterior-posterior shear on the wear of CHARITÉ total disc replacement. Vicars R; Prokopovich P; Brown TD; Tipper JL; Ingham E; Fisher J; Hall RM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):E528-34. PubMed ID: 22037530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns. O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the loading frequency on the wear rate of a polyethylene-on-metal lumbar intervertebral disc replacement. Kettler A; Bushelow M; Wilke HJ Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S709-16. PubMed ID: 20936310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine. Knapik GG; Mendel E; Marras WS Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S641-52. PubMed ID: 21445618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement. Cakir B; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Schmidt R; Reichel H; Wilke HJ Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S592-8. PubMed ID: 19882178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymmetric motion distribution between components of a mobile-core lumbar disc prosthesis: an explanation of unequal wear distribution in explanted CHARITÉ polyethylene cores. Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Wharton ND; Tsitsopoulos PP; Newman P; Carandang G; Voronov LI J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(9):846-54. PubMed ID: 22552675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In silico evaluation of a new composite disc substitute with a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model. Noailly J; Ambrosio L; Elizabeth Tanner K; Planell JA; Lacroix D Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S675-87. PubMed ID: 21380572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Basic principles of successful implantation of the SB Charité model LINK intervertebral disk endoprosthesis]. Büttner-Janz K; Hahn S; Schikora K; Link HD Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):441-53. PubMed ID: 12089793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fluoroscopic assessment of lumbar total disc replacement kinematics during walking. Barrett RS; Lichtwark GA; Armstrong C; Barber L; Scott-Young M; Hall RM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):436-42. PubMed ID: 25599285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation. Faizan A; Goel VK; Garfin SR; Bono CM; Serhan H; Biyani A; Elgafy H; Krishna M; Friesem T Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S653-62. PubMed ID: 19936805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear in ceramic on ceramic type lumbar total disc replacement: effect of radial clearance. Shankar S; Kesavan D Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 26484559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Goel VK; Grauer JN; Patel TCh; Biyani A; Sairyo K; Vishnubhotla S; Matyas A; Cowgill I; Shaw M; Long R; Dick D; Panjabi MM; Serhan H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2755-64. PubMed ID: 16371899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of Cadisc™-L with natural lumbar discs in axial compression and sagittal flexion. McNally D; Naylor J; Johnson S Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S612-7. PubMed ID: 22411042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumbar total disc replacement impingement sensitivity to disc height distraction, spinal sagittal orientation, implant position, and implant lordosis. Rundell SA; Day JS; Isaza J; Guillory S; Kurtz SM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):E590-8. PubMed ID: 22146286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of lumbar artificial disc design on intervertebral mobility: in vivo comparison between mobile-core and fixed-core. Delécrin J; Allain J; Beaurain J; Steib JP; Huppert J; Chataigner H; Ameil M; Aubourg L; Nguyen JM Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S630-40. PubMed ID: 21153595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controlled motion with the XL-TDR lateral-approach lumbar total disk replacement: in vitro kinematic investigation. Pimenta L; Turner A; Oliveira L; Marchi L; Cornwall B J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 76(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 25545808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic, six-axis stiffness matrix characteristics of the intact intervertebral disc and a disc replacement. Holsgrove TP; Gill HS; Miles AW; Gheduzzi S Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Nov; 229(11):769-77. PubMed ID: 26503838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]