These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20582814)

  • 41. Failures of Imagination: Disability and the Ethics of Selective Reproduction.
    Soniewicka M
    Bioethics; 2015 Oct; 29(8):557-63. PubMed ID: 25689344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reconceptualizing nursing ethics.
    Cooper MC
    Sch Inq Nurs Pract; 1990; 4(3):209-18; discussion 219-21. PubMed ID: 2274732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Chance, choice and control: lay debate on prenatal social sex selection.
    Scully JL; Banks S; Shakespeare TW
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16459006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sex selection and the procreative liberty framework.
    de Melo-Martín I
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Mar; 23(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 23678627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Advice no. 22 of 19 May 2003 concerning the choice of sex for non-medical reasons].
    Belgium. Comite Consultatif de Bioethique
    J Int Bioethique; 2005; 16(1-2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16637140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?
    Dickens BM
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Dec; 28(6):335-6. PubMed ID: 12468649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prenatal sex and race determination is a slippery slope.
    Andreae M
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Aug; 30(4):376; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 15289523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Manninen's defense of abortion rights is unsuccessful.
    Marquis D
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):56-7. PubMed ID: 21161848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Why Procreative Preferences May be Moral - And Why it May not Matter if They Aren't.
    Saunders B
    Bioethics; 2015 Sep; 29(7):499-506. PubMed ID: 25655693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Wartime medical ethics.
    Holdstock D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):6-7; author reply 7. PubMed ID: 16092386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A supportive yet critical response to "Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition".
    Liebegott K
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):61-3. PubMed ID: 21161851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Toward a full theory of moral status.
    Green R
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):44-6; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Medical ethics and reproductive genetics in Swedish public discourse.
    Dekker C
    Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):100-5. PubMed ID: 12755111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The reversal test: eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics.
    Bostrom N; Ord T
    Ethics; 2006 Jul; 116(4):656-79. PubMed ID: 17039628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Care theory and the ideal of neutrality in public moral discourse.
    Groenhout R
    J Med Philos; 1998 Apr; 23(2):170-89. PubMed ID: 9638568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Morality, potential persons and abortion.
    Bigelow J; Pargetter R
    Am Philos Q; 1988 Apr; 25(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 11655906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it.
    Mulder J
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 21161853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status?
    Jotterand F
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):45-52. PubMed ID: 20582831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Deep disagreement and Rawlsian "public reasons".
    White A; MacDonald C
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):62-3; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An evaluative conservative case for biomedical enhancement.
    Danaher J
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Sep; 42(9):611-8. PubMed ID: 27354246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.