164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20582818)
1. The risks of "sexual normalcy".
Green RM
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):13-4. PubMed ID: 20582818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Why bioethicists still need to think more about sex ..
Sparrow R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):W1-3. PubMed ID: 20582814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is there a moral obligation to have children of only one sex?
Kamenova K
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 20582825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual dimorphism and the value of feminist bioethics.
Matchett NJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 20582821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should human beings have sex? Sexual dimorphism and human enhancement.
Sparrow R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):3-12. PubMed ID: 20582815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex and enhancement: a phenomenological-existential view.
Slatman J; Halsema A; Widdershoven G
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):20-2. PubMed ID: 20582822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Humans should be free of all biological limitations including sex.
Hughes JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):15. PubMed ID: 20582819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Resisting Sparrow's sexy reductio: selection principles and the social good.
Douglas T; Powell R; Devolder K; Stafforini P; Rippon S
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):16-8. PubMed ID: 20582820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. This is what happens when you forget about gender.
O'Connor D
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):27-9. PubMed ID: 20582826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of sex in procreative reasons.
Kahane G; Savulescu J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):22-4. PubMed ID: 20582823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a "post-posthuman dignity area" in evaluating emerging enhancement technologies.
Bredenoord AL; van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):55-7. PubMed ID: 20582833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future.
Davis DS
Rutgers Law J; 1997; 28():549-92. PubMed ID: 12465646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection.
Liao SM
J Med Ethics; 2005 Feb; 31(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 15681683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ethical aspects of preliminary sex selection of the fetus].
Aleksandrova S; Bozhinova S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2006; 45(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 17168495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection.
McDougall R
J Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 31(10):601-5. PubMed ID: 16199604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.
Bennett R
Bioethics; 2009 Jun; 23(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 18477055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomedical enhancements as justice.
Nam J
Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 24117708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is sex selection ethical?
Fletcher JC
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 128():333-48. PubMed ID: 6579560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defending the distinction between treatment and enhancement.
Schwartz PH
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(3):17-9; discussion W4-9. PubMed ID: 16006367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The expressive meaning of enhancement.
Martin AM; Peerzada J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(3):25-7; discussion W4-9. PubMed ID: 16006366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
