BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20582829)

  • 1. On the costly compromises of nonclinical research relationships.
    Liberto H
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):41-2. PubMed ID: 20582829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex redux.
    Murphy TF
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):W4-5. PubMed ID: 20582816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No sex please in sexuality research.
    Haire B
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):43-4. PubMed ID: 20582830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No sex please, we're social scientists?
    Dunn M; Sheehan M
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):39-41. PubMed ID: 20582828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex, romance, and research subjects: an ethical exploration.
    Murphy TF
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):30-8. PubMed ID: 20582827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical considerations in the communication of unexpected information with clinical implications.
    Lavieri RR; Garner SA
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):46-8; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".
    Edwards SJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):W1-3. PubMed ID: 21480062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical utility and full disclosure of genetic results to research participants.
    Sharp RR; Foster MW
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):42-4; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.
    Fernandez CV; Weijer C
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):44-6; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To study, perchance to treat.
    Trachtman H
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 19180382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomization can be risky.
    Lott J
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 19180386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding randomization: helpful strategies.
    Brody H; Childress AM
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 19180384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equipoise trumps randomization.
    Fox MD; Hellman CM; Jelley MR
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 19180383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Northwestern U. psychologist accused of having sex with research subject.
    Wilson R
    Chron High Educ; 2003 Dec; 50(17):A17. PubMed ID: 15287138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dirty little truth: we want them to understand, but not really..
    Morreim H
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 19180381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomization and the transactional framework for informed consent.
    Reynolds D; Fleming DA
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 19180385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equipoise may be in the eye of the beholder.
    Moyer A; Floyd AH
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 19180388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships with test-tubes: where's the reciprocity?
    Fryer-Edwards K; Fullerton SM
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):36-8; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Considering the nature of individual research results.
    Beskow LM
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):38-40; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One size does not fit all.
    Facio FM
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):40-2; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.