These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20583398)

  • 1. Aortic dilatation in patients with prosthetic aortic valve: comparison of MRI and echocardiography.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Abdel-Aty H; Schulz-Menger J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 20583398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Altiok E; Frick M; Meyer CG; Al Ateah G; Napp A; Kirschfink A; Almalla M; Lotfi S; Becker M; Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ascending aortic diameters in congenital aortic stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
    van der Linde D; Rossi A; Yap SC; McGhie JS; van den Bosch AE; Kirschbaum SW; Russo B; van Dijk AP; Moelker A; Krestin GP; van Geuns RJ; Roos-Hesselink JW
    Echocardiography; 2013 May; 30(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 23305528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Dieringer MA; Greiser A; Schulz-Menger J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):736-42. PubMed ID: 21342775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave Doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Thavendiranathan P; Liu S; Datta S; Walls M; Nitinunu A; Van Houten T; Tomson NA; Vidmar L; Georgescu B; Wang Y; Srinivasan S; De Michelis N; Raman SV; Ryan T; Vannan MA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jan; 25(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 22105057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants of ascending aortic dimensions after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis.
    Botzenhardt F; Hoffmann E; Kemkes BM; Gansera B
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 17315379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Schulz-Menger J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Jun; 12(1):36. PubMed ID: 20573227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multimodality Assessment of Ascending Aortic Diameters: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods.
    Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Teixidó-Tura G; Galuppo V; Cuéllar H; Laynez A; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas MT; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Sep; 29(9):819-826.e4. PubMed ID: 27288090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: comparison of three-dimensional (3D) navigated steady-state free-precession (SSFP), 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP.
    Potthast S; Mitsumori L; Stanescu LA; Richardson ML; Branch K; Dubinsky TJ; Maki JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 20027585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Choe YH; Kim SM; Kim EK; Lee M; Park SJ; Ahn J; Carriere KC
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1266-1278. PubMed ID: 33938648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2D cine vs. 3D self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance for aortic root measurements in congenital heart disease.
    Nussbaumer C; Bouchardy J; Blanche C; Piccini D; Pavon AG; Monney P; Stuber M; Schwitter J; Rutz T
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 May; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 34039356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
    Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Ribeiro HB; Le Ven F; Larose E; Dahou A; Nombela-Franco L; Urena M; Allende R; Amat-Santos I; Ricapito Mde L; Thébault C; Clavel MA; Delarochelliére R; Doyle D; Dumont E; Dumesnil JG; Pibarot P; Rodés-Cabau J
    Heart; 2014 Dec; 100(24):1924-32. PubMed ID: 25124218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of proximal aortic diameter in hypertensive patients: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Leone D; Tosello F; Faletti R; Schivazappa G; Bruno G; Avenatti E; Ravera A; Veglio F; Milan A
    J Hypertens; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1626-1634. PubMed ID: 28399041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of native high-resolution 3D and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for assessing the thoracic aorta.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Gruettner H; Trauzeddel RF; Greiser A; Schulz-Menger J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 24399340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic Measurements in Patients with Aortopathy are Larger and More Reproducible by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Compared with Echocardiography.
    Nejatian A; Yu J; Geva T; White MT; Prakash A
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 36(8):1761-73. PubMed ID: 26174757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for TAVR assessment in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves: comparison with computed tomography.
    Quail MA; Nordmeyer J; Schievano S; Reinthaler M; Mullen MJ; Taylor AM
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3912-7. PubMed ID: 22889591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
    Levy F; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Hugues N; Alexandrescu C; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3-T magnetic resonance for determination of aortic valve area: a comparison to echocardiography.
    Speiser U; Quick S; Haas D; Youssef A; Waessnig NK; Ibrahim K; Strasser RH; Schoen S
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2014 Jun; 48(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 24650089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.