133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20584405)
1. Defending the concept of "concepts".
Hayes BK; Kearney L
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):214. PubMed ID: 20584405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Not different kinds, just special cases.
Danks D
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):208-9. PubMed ID: 20584399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are prototypes and exemplars used in distinct cognitive processes?
Virtel J; Piccinini G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):226-7. PubMed ID: 20584418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From conceptual representations to explanatory relations.
Lombrozo T
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):218-9. PubMed ID: 20584410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concepts are a functional kind.
Lalumera E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):217-8. PubMed ID: 20584409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unity amidst heterogeneity in theories of concepts.
Edwards K
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):210-1. PubMed ID: 20584401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parsimony and the triple-system model of concepts.
Zaki S; Cruz J
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):230-1. PubMed ID: 20584422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An additional heterogeneity hypothesis.
Dove G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):209-10. PubMed ID: 20584400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The function and representation of concepts.
Khemlani SS; Goodwin G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):216-7. PubMed ID: 20584408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conceptual atomism rethought.
Schneider S
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):224-5. PubMed ID: 20584416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Précis of doing without concepts.
Machery E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):195-206; discussion 206-44. PubMed ID: 20584396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Default knowledge, time pressure, and the theory-theory of concepts.
Blanchard T
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):206-7. PubMed ID: 20584397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence of coordination as a cure for concept eliminativism.
Scarantino A
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):223-4. PubMed ID: 20584415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two uneliminated uses for "concepts": hybrids and guides for inquiry.
Gonnerman C; Weinberg JM
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):211-2. PubMed ID: 20584402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The faux, fake, forged, false, fabricated, and phony: problems for the independence of similarity-based theories of concepts.
Jacobson AJ
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215. PubMed ID: 20584407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The theoretical indispensability of concepts.
Weiskopf DA
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):228-9. PubMed ID: 20584420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abstraction and context in concept representation.
Hampton JA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2003 Jul; 358(1435):1251-9. PubMed ID: 12903660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The GIST of concepts.
Vigo R
Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):138-62. PubMed ID: 23891825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought.
Aerts D; Gabora L; Sozzo S
Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):737-72. PubMed ID: 24039114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Representations of body and space: theoretical concepts and controversies.
Trojan J
Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():417-20. PubMed ID: 26224274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
