158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20584412)
1. Where are nature's joints? Finding the mechanisms underlying categorization.
Markman AB
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):220-1. PubMed ID: 20584412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eliminating the "concept" concept.
Harnad S
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):213-4. PubMed ID: 20584404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The theoretical indispensability of concepts.
Weiskopf DA
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):228-9. PubMed ID: 20584420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Précis of doing without concepts.
Machery E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):195-206; discussion 206-44. PubMed ID: 20584396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why don't concepts constitute a natural kind?
Samuels R; Ferreira M
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):222-3. PubMed ID: 20584414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concepts are a functional kind.
Lalumera E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):217-8. PubMed ID: 20584409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are prototypes and exemplars used in distinct cognitive processes?
Virtel J; Piccinini G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):226-7. PubMed ID: 20584418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of coordination as a cure for concept eliminativism.
Scarantino A
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):223-4. PubMed ID: 20584415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mental imagery as the adaptationist views it.
Pani JR
Conscious Cogn; 1996 Sep; 5(3):288-326. PubMed ID: 8906405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Banishing the thought.
Strohminger N; Moore BW
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):225-6. PubMed ID: 20584417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From numerical concepts to concepts of number.
Rips LJ; Bloomfield A; Asmuth J
Behav Brain Sci; 2008 Dec; 31(6):623-42; discussion 642-87. PubMed ID: 19077327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unity amidst heterogeneity in theories of concepts.
Edwards K
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):210-1. PubMed ID: 20584401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Representing task context: proposals based on a connectionist model of action.
Botvinick M; Plaut DC
Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):298-311. PubMed ID: 12466927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanisms of theory formation in young children.
Gopnik A; Schulz L
Trends Cogn Sci; 2004 Aug; 8(8):371-7. PubMed ID: 15335464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does cognitive science need kernels?
Jäkel F; Schölkopf B; Wichmann FA
Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Sep; 13(9):381-8. PubMed ID: 19729333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can synaesthesia research inform cognitive science?
Cohen Kadosh R; Henik A
Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Apr; 11(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 17331789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Models and theories of brain function in cognition within a framework of behavioral cognitive psychology.
Karakaş S; Başar E
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 May; 60(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 16504321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the necessity of U-shaped learning.
Carlucci L; Case J
Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):56-88. PubMed ID: 23335574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The architecture and dynamics of developing mind: experiential structuralism as a frame for unifying cognitive developmental theories.
Demetriou A; Efklides A; Platsidou M
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1993; 58(5-6):1-205. PubMed ID: 8232367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dyslexic participants show intact spontaneous categorization processes.
Nikolopoulos DS; Pothos EM
Dyslexia; 2009 Aug; 15(3):167-86. PubMed ID: 18819159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
