104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20584415)
1. Evidence of coordination as a cure for concept eliminativism.
Scarantino A
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):223-4. PubMed ID: 20584415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The theoretical indispensability of concepts.
Weiskopf DA
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):228-9. PubMed ID: 20584420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Concepts are a functional kind.
Lalumera E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):217-8. PubMed ID: 20584409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Where are nature's joints? Finding the mechanisms underlying categorization.
Markman AB
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):220-1. PubMed ID: 20584412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concepts and theoretical unification.
Margolis E; Laurence S
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):219-20. PubMed ID: 20584411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are prototypes and exemplars used in distinct cognitive processes?
Virtel J; Piccinini G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):226-7. PubMed ID: 20584418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defending the concept of "concepts".
Hayes BK; Kearney L
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):214. PubMed ID: 20584405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Précis of doing without concepts.
Machery E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):195-206; discussion 206-44. PubMed ID: 20584396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unity amidst heterogeneity in theories of concepts.
Edwards K
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):210-1. PubMed ID: 20584401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A conceptual framework for studying emotions-cognitions-performance linkage under conditions that vary in perceived pressure.
Tenenbaum G; Hatfield BD; Eklund RC; Land WM; Calmeiro L; Razon S; Schack T
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():159-78. PubMed ID: 19477338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The faux, fake, forged, false, fabricated, and phony: problems for the independence of similarity-based theories of concepts.
Jacobson AJ
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215. PubMed ID: 20584407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why don't concepts constitute a natural kind?
Samuels R; Ferreira M
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):222-3. PubMed ID: 20584414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Doing with development: moving toward a complete theory of concepts.
Vlach HA; Krogh L; Thom EE; Sandhofer CM
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):227-8. PubMed ID: 20584419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concept talk cannot be avoided.
Hampton JA
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):212-3. PubMed ID: 20584403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid vigor and conceptual structure.
Keil F
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215-6. PubMed ID: 20584406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Children's understanding of addition and subtraction concepts.
Robinson KM; Dubé AK
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Aug; 103(4):532-45. PubMed ID: 19167015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future.
Mikhail J
Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Apr; 11(4):143-52. PubMed ID: 17329147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The situated nature of concepts.
Yeh W; Barsalou LW
Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):349-84. PubMed ID: 17061691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From conceptual representations to explanatory relations.
Lombrozo T
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):218-9. PubMed ID: 20584410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concepts versus conceptions (again).
Rey G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):221-2. PubMed ID: 20584413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
