119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20584416)
1. Conceptual atomism rethought.
Schneider S
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):224-5. PubMed ID: 20584416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unity amidst heterogeneity in theories of concepts.
Edwards K
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):210-1. PubMed ID: 20584401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From conceptual representations to explanatory relations.
Lombrozo T
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):218-9. PubMed ID: 20584410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Not different kinds, just special cases.
Danks D
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):208-9. PubMed ID: 20584399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concepts are a functional kind.
Lalumera E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):217-8. PubMed ID: 20584409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defending the concept of "concepts".
Hayes BK; Kearney L
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):214. PubMed ID: 20584405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are prototypes and exemplars used in distinct cognitive processes?
Virtel J; Piccinini G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):226-7. PubMed ID: 20584418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Default knowledge, time pressure, and the theory-theory of concepts.
Blanchard T
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):206-7. PubMed ID: 20584397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parsimony and the triple-system model of concepts.
Zaki S; Cruz J
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):230-1. PubMed ID: 20584422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Koffka, Köhler, and the "crisis" in psychology.
Hatfield G
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2012 Jun; 43(2):483-92. PubMed ID: 22520197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two uneliminated uses for "concepts": hybrids and guides for inquiry.
Gonnerman C; Weinberg JM
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):211-2. PubMed ID: 20584402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The faux, fake, forged, false, fabricated, and phony: problems for the independence of similarity-based theories of concepts.
Jacobson AJ
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215. PubMed ID: 20584407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The function and representation of concepts.
Khemlani SS; Goodwin G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):216-7. PubMed ID: 20584408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A philosophical view on concepts in psychiatry.
Malmgren H; Radovic S; Thorén H; Haglund B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 20061028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward a richer view of the scientific method. The role of conceptual analysis.
Machado A; Silva FJ
Am Psychol; 2007 Oct; 62(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 17924750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An additional heterogeneity hypothesis.
Dove G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):209-10. PubMed ID: 20584400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concepts: a potboiler.
Fodor J
Cognition; 1994; 50(1-3):95-113. PubMed ID: 8039378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Philosophy of mind in the clinic: the relation between causal and meaningful explanation in psychiatry.
Brendel DH
Harv Rev Psychiatry; 2000 Oct; 8(4):184-91. PubMed ID: 11038343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the conceptual universe.
Kemp C
Psychol Rev; 2012 Oct; 119(4):685-722. PubMed ID: 22924770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization.
Rehder B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1141-59. PubMed ID: 14622052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
