119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20584418)
1. Are prototypes and exemplars used in distinct cognitive processes?
Virtel J; Piccinini G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):226-7. PubMed ID: 20584418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defending the concept of "concepts".
Hayes BK; Kearney L
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):214. PubMed ID: 20584405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Concepts are a functional kind.
Lalumera E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):217-8. PubMed ID: 20584409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unity amidst heterogeneity in theories of concepts.
Edwards K
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):210-1. PubMed ID: 20584401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The function and representation of concepts.
Khemlani SS; Goodwin G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):216-7. PubMed ID: 20584408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From conceptual representations to explanatory relations.
Lombrozo T
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):218-9. PubMed ID: 20584410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not different kinds, just special cases.
Danks D
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):208-9. PubMed ID: 20584399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Where are nature's joints? Finding the mechanisms underlying categorization.
Markman AB
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):220-1. PubMed ID: 20584412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The faux, fake, forged, false, fabricated, and phony: problems for the independence of similarity-based theories of concepts.
Jacobson AJ
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215. PubMed ID: 20584407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conceptual atomism rethought.
Schneider S
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):224-5. PubMed ID: 20584416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence of coordination as a cure for concept eliminativism.
Scarantino A
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):223-4. PubMed ID: 20584415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Précis of doing without concepts.
Machery E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):195-206; discussion 206-44. PubMed ID: 20584396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The theoretical indispensability of concepts.
Weiskopf DA
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):228-9. PubMed ID: 20584420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concept talk cannot be avoided.
Hampton JA
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):212-3. PubMed ID: 20584403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuities and discontinuities in children and scholarship.
Liben LS
Child Dev; 2008; 79(6):1600-5. PubMed ID: 19037934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parsimony and the triple-system model of concepts.
Zaki S; Cruz J
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):230-1. PubMed ID: 20584422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Default knowledge, time pressure, and the theory-theory of concepts.
Blanchard T
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):206-7. PubMed ID: 20584397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological and epistemological issues in the interpretation of infant cognitive development.
Müller U; Giesbrecht G
Child Dev; 2008; 79(6):1654-8. PubMed ID: 19037940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche.
Clark A
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Aug; 10(8):370-4. PubMed ID: 16843701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A conceptual framework for studying emotions-cognitions-performance linkage under conditions that vary in perceived pressure.
Tenenbaum G; Hatfield BD; Eklund RC; Land WM; Calmeiro L; Razon S; Schack T
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():159-78. PubMed ID: 19477338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
