104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20584420)
1. The theoretical indispensability of concepts.
Weiskopf DA
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):228-9. PubMed ID: 20584420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concepts are a functional kind.
Lalumera E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):217-8. PubMed ID: 20584409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Where are nature's joints? Finding the mechanisms underlying categorization.
Markman AB
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):220-1. PubMed ID: 20584412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Précis of doing without concepts.
Machery E
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):195-206; discussion 206-44. PubMed ID: 20584396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence of coordination as a cure for concept eliminativism.
Scarantino A
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):223-4. PubMed ID: 20584415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concepts and theoretical unification.
Margolis E; Laurence S
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):219-20. PubMed ID: 20584411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Banishing the thought.
Strohminger N; Moore BW
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):225-6. PubMed ID: 20584417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why don't concepts constitute a natural kind?
Samuels R; Ferreira M
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):222-3. PubMed ID: 20584414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are prototypes and exemplars used in distinct cognitive processes?
Virtel J; Piccinini G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):226-7. PubMed ID: 20584418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliminating the "concept" concept.
Harnad S
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):213-4. PubMed ID: 20584404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unity amidst heterogeneity in theories of concepts.
Edwards K
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):210-1. PubMed ID: 20584401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mental imagery as the adaptationist views it.
Pani JR
Conscious Cogn; 1996 Sep; 5(3):288-326. PubMed ID: 8906405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defending the concept of "concepts".
Hayes BK; Kearney L
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):214. PubMed ID: 20584405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doing with development: moving toward a complete theory of concepts.
Vlach HA; Krogh L; Thom EE; Sandhofer CM
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):227-8. PubMed ID: 20584419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Not different kinds, just special cases.
Danks D
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):208-9. PubMed ID: 20584399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The faux, fake, forged, false, fabricated, and phony: problems for the independence of similarity-based theories of concepts.
Jacobson AJ
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215. PubMed ID: 20584407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The function and representation of concepts.
Khemlani SS; Goodwin G
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):216-7. PubMed ID: 20584408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From conceptual representations to explanatory relations.
Lombrozo T
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):218-9. PubMed ID: 20584410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 100 years of psychology of concepts: the theoretical notion of concept and its operationalization.
Machery E
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2007 Mar; 38(1):63-84. PubMed ID: 17324809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybrid vigor and conceptual structure.
Keil F
Behav Brain Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(2-3):215-6. PubMed ID: 20584406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
