189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20585386)
1. Sympatric and allopatric divergence of MHC genes in threespine stickleback.
Matthews B; Harmon LJ; M'Gonigle L; Marchinko KB; Schaschl H
PLoS One; 2010 Jun; 5(6):e10948. PubMed ID: 20585386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks.
Rundle HD
Evolution; 2002 Feb; 56(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 11926500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Specialization of trophic position and habitat use by sticklebacks in an adaptive radiation.
Matthews B; Marchinko KB; Bolnick DI; Mazumder A
Ecology; 2010 Apr; 91(4):1025-34. PubMed ID: 20462117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Character shifts in the defensive armor of sympatric sticklebacks.
Vamosi SM; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):376-85. PubMed ID: 15068354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.
Bay RA; Arnegard ME; Conte GL; Best J; Bedford NL; McCann SR; Dubin ME; Chan YF; Jones FC; Kingsley DM; Schluter D; Peichel CL
Curr Biol; 2017 Nov; 27(21):3344-3349.e4. PubMed ID: 29056455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impacts of trout predation on fitness of sympatric sticklebacks and their hybrids.
Vamosi SM; Schluter D
Proc Biol Sci; 2002 May; 269(1494):923-30. PubMed ID: 12028775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Natural selection on MHC IIβ in parapatric lake and stream stickleback: Balancing, divergent, both or neither?
Stutz WE; Bolnick DI
Mol Ecol; 2017 Sep; 26(18):4772-4786. PubMed ID: 28437583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A test of hybrid growth disadvantage in wild, free-ranging species pairs of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and its implications for ecological speciation.
Taylor EB; Gerlinsky C; Farrell N; Gow JL
Evolution; 2012 Jan; 66(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 22220878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Plastic responses to parents and predators lead to divergent shoaling behaviour in sticklebacks.
Kozak GM; Boughman JW
J Evol Biol; 2012 Apr; 25(4):759-69. PubMed ID: 22320242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Putative causes and consequences of MHC variation within and between locally adapted stickleback demes.
McCairns RJ; Bourget S; Bernatchez L
Mol Ecol; 2011 Feb; 20(3):486-502. PubMed ID: 21134013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional basis of ecological divergence in sympatric stickleback.
McGee MD; Schluter D; Wainwright PC
BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Dec; 13():277. PubMed ID: 24380474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speciation in ninespine stickleback: reproductive isolation and phenotypic divergence among cryptic species of Japanese ninespine stickleback.
Ishikawa A; Takeuchi N; Kusakabe M; Kume M; Mori S; Takahashi H; Kitano J
J Evol Biol; 2013 Jul; 26(7):1417-30. PubMed ID: 23663028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parasites and parallel divergence of the number of individual MHC alleles between sympatric three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus morphs in Iceland.
Natsopoulou ME; Pálsson S; Ólafsdóttir GÁ
J Fish Biol; 2012 Oct; 81(5):1696-714. PubMed ID: 23020569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency dependence limits divergent evolution by favouring rare immigrants over residents.
Bolnick DI; Stutz WE
Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7657):285-288. PubMed ID: 28562593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The temporal window of ecological adaptation in postglacial lakes: a comparison of head morphology, trophic position and habitat use in Norwegian threespine stickleback populations.
Østbye K; Harrod C; Gregersen F; Klepaker T; Schulz M; Schluter D; Vøllestad LA
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 May; 16():102. PubMed ID: 27178328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The genomic signature of ecological divergence along the benthic-limnetic axis in allopatric and sympatric threespine stickleback.
Härer A; Bolnick DI; Rennison DJ
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jan; 30(2):451-463. PubMed ID: 33222348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
Conte GL; Schluter D
Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?
Albert AY; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15212390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic landscape of early ecological speciation initiated by selection on nuptial colour.
Marques DA; Lucek K; Haesler MP; Feller AF; Meier JI; Wagner CE; Excoffier L; Seehausen O
Mol Ecol; 2017 Jan; 26(1):7-24. PubMed ID: 27483035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Divergent Macroparasite Infections in Parapatric Swiss Lake-Stream Pairs of Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
Karvonen A; Lucek K; Marques DA; Seehausen O
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130579. PubMed ID: 26086778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
