255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20585960)
1. Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.
Iwata N; Fujiwara M; Kodera Y; Tanaka C; Ohashi N; Nakayama G; Koike M; Nakao A
Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 20585960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Construct validity of individual and summary performance metrics associated with a computer-based laparoscopic simulator.
Rivard JD; Vergis AS; Unger BJ; Hardy KM; Andrew CG; Gillman LM; Park J
Surg Endosc; 2014 Jun; 28(6):1921-8. PubMed ID: 24442685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator.
Yamaguchi S; Konishi K; Yasunaga T; Yoshida D; Kinjo N; Kobayashi K; Ieiri S; Okazaki K; Nakashima H; Tanoue K; Maehara Y; Hashizume M
Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2253-7. PubMed ID: 17479319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor): evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator.
Zhang A; Hünerbein M; Dai Y; Schlag PM; Beller S
Surg Endosc; 2008 Jun; 22(6):1440-4. PubMed ID: 17972134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?
Shanmugan S; Leblanc F; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Stein SL; Khan S; Delaney CP; Champagne BJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24401883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics may not correlate with operative performance in a novice cohort.
Steigerwald SN; Park J; Hardy KM; Gillman L; Vergis AS
Med Educ Online; 2015; 20():30024. PubMed ID: 26641071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?
van Dongen KW; Tournoij E; van der Zee DC; Schijven MP; Broeders IA
Surg Endosc; 2007 Aug; 21(8):1413-7. PubMed ID: 17294307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.
Nemani A; Ahn W; Cooper C; Schwaitzberg S; De S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 28812196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A surgical virtual reality simulator distinguishes between expert gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and perinatologists.
Mohtashami F; von Dadelszen P; Allaire C
JSLS; 2011; 15(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 21985726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.
Verdaasdonk EG; Stassen LP; Monteny LJ; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2006 Mar; 20(3):511-8. PubMed ID: 16437275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the learning of laparoscopic skills be quantified by the measurements of skill parameters performed in a virtual reality simulator?
Sandy NS; Cruz JA; Passerotti CC; Nguyen H; Reis ST; Gouveia EM; Duarte RJ; Bruschini H; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 23849568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.
Beyer-Berjot L; Berdah S; Hashimoto DA; Darzi A; Aggarwal R
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):932-941. PubMed ID: 27342755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Instrument Motion Metrics for Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality.
Fransson BA; Chen CY; Noyes JA; Ragle CA
Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(S1):O5-O13. PubMed ID: 27239013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construct and face validity of a virtual reality-based camera navigation curriculum.
Shetty S; Panait L; Baranoski J; Dudrick SJ; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 177(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 22739048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can virtual reality simulators be a certification tool for bariatric surgeons?
Giannotti D; Patrizi G; Casella G; Di Rocco G; Marchetti M; Frezzotti F; Bernieri MG; Vestri AR; Redler A
Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):242-8. PubMed ID: 23996341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a Novel Inverted Peg Transfer Task: Advancing Beyond the Regular Peg Transfer Task for Surgical Simulation-Based Assessment.
Abdelrahman AM; Yu D; Lowndes BR; Buckarma EH; Gas BL; Farley DR; Bingener J; Hallbeck MS
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):836-843. PubMed ID: 29037821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Force and Psychomotor Skills in a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Haptic Simulator.
Prasad MS; Manivannan M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):858-69. PubMed ID: 27267563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Basic laparoscopic training using the Simbionix LAP Mentor: setting the standards in the novice group.
von Websky MW; Vitz M; Raptis DA; Rosenthal R; Clavien PA; Hahnloser D
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 22677582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does laparoscopic simulation predict intraoperative performance? A comparison between the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics.
Steigerwald SN; Park J; Hardy KM; Gillman LM; Vergis AS
Am J Surg; 2015 Jan; 209(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25454953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved nondominant hand performance on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator after playing the Nintendo Wii.
Middleton KK; Hamilton T; Tsai PC; Middleton DB; Falcone JL; Hamad G
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4224-31. PubMed ID: 23760943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
