186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20586623)
1. Adequacy of surgical pathology reporting of cancer: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 86 institutions.
Idowu MO; Bekeris LG; Raab S; Ruby SG; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 134(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 20586623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Challenges and opportunities in the adoption of College of American Pathologists checklists in electronic format: perspectives and experience of Reporting Pathology Protocols Project (RPP2) participant laboratories.
Hassell LA; Parwani AV; Weiss L; Jones MA; Ye J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20670135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Missing Elements in Surgical Pathology Reports: Breast, Colon and Stomach Cancers.
Kadivar M; Rahimabad PK
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(3):1469-72. PubMed ID: 27039791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma.
Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Bekeris LG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):969-74. PubMed ID: 21809987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Srigley J; Grignon D; Humphrey P;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Sep; 38(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17707261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lung carcinoma surgical pathology report adequacy: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of over 8300 cases from 464 institutions.
Gephardt GN; Baker PB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):922-7. PubMed ID: 12046605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of a synoptic data tool for reporting of head and neck neoplasms based on the College of American Pathologists cancer checklists.
Kang HP; Devine LJ; Piccoli AL; Seethala RR; Amin W; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Oct; 132(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 19762529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Opportunities for Improvement in Pathology Reporting of Childhood Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Report From Children's Oncology Group (COG) Study ARST0332.
Black JO; Coffin CM; Parham DM; Hawkins DS; Speights RA; Spunt SL
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 146(3):328-38. PubMed ID: 27510717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system.
Qu Z; Ninan S; Almosa A; Chang KG; Kuruvilla S; Nguyen N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 127(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 17509987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Web-based synoptic reporting for cancer checklists.
Baskovich BW; Allan RW
J Pathol Inform; 2011 Mar; 2():16. PubMed ID: 21572504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Turnaround time for large or complex specimens in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 56 institutions.
Volmar KE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Karcher DS; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 139(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 25611100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting guidelines for clinical laboratory reports in surgical pathology.
Goldsmith JD; Siegal GP; Suster S; Wheeler TM; Brown RW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 132(10):1608-16. PubMed ID: 18834219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Key issues in reporting common cancer specimen findings using the College of American Pathologists cancer protocols.
Amin MB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 16519554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 8629896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines.
Wilkinson NW; Shahryarinejad A; Winston JS; Watroba N; Edge SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 12517547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
