These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20586979)

  • 1. Pharmacoeconomic guidelines and their implementation in the positive list system in South Korea.
    Bae EY; Lee EK
    Value Health; 2009; 12 Suppl 3():S36-41. PubMed ID: 20586979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation on the first 2 years of the positive list system in South Korea.
    Park SE; Lim SH; Choi HW; Lee SM; Kim DW; Yim EY; Kim KH; Yi SY
    Health Policy; 2012 Jan; 104(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 22001369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic evaluation and pharmaceutical reimbursement reform in South Korea's National Health Insurance.
    Yang BM; Bae EY; Kim J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 18180493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eight-year experience of using HTA in drug reimbursement: South Korea.
    Bae EY; Hong JM; Kwon HY; Jang S; Lee HJ; Bae S; Yang BM
    Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 120(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 27086557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].
    Hoomans T; van der Roer N; Severens JL; Delwel GO
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A958. PubMed ID: 20699045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative analysis of the impact of a positive list system on new chemical entity drugs and incrementally modified drugs in South Korea.
    Ha D; Choi Y; Kim DU; Chung KH; Lee EK
    Clin Ther; 2011 Jul; 33(7):926-32. PubMed ID: 21715008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drug reimbursement decision-making in Thailand, China, and South Korea.
    Ngorsuraches S; Meng W; Kim BY; Kulsomboon V
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S120-5. PubMed ID: 22265058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different policy outcomes of the new drugs and currently listed drugs under the positive list system in South Korea.
    Lee EK; Kim BY; Lim JY; Park MH
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S100-3. PubMed ID: 22265054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of economic evidence in coverage decision-making in South Korea.
    Bae EY; Kim HJ; Lee HJ; Jang J; Lee SM; Jung Y; Yoon N; Kim TK; Kim K; Yang BM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206121. PubMed ID: 30356251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based decision-making in Asia-Pacific with rapidly changing health-care systems: Thailand, South Korea, and Taiwan.
    Jirawattanapisal T; Kingkaew P; Lee TJ; Yang MC
    Value Health; 2009; 12 Suppl 3():S4-11. PubMed ID: 20586980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National reimbursement listing determinants of new cancer drugs: a retrospective analysis of 58 cancer treatment appraisals in 2007-2016 in South Korea.
    Kim ES; Kim JA; Lee EK
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Aug; 17(4):401-409. PubMed ID: 28010146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of pharmacoeconomic evaluations submitted for reimbursement in Korea.
    Yim EY; Lim SH; Oh MJ; Park HK; Gong JR; Park SE; Yi SY
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S104-10. PubMed ID: 22265055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based decision on medical technologies in Asia Pacific: experiences from India, Malaysia, Philippines, and Pakistan.
    Thatte U; Hussain S; de Rosas-Valera M; Malik MA
    Value Health; 2009; 12 Suppl 3():S18-25. PubMed ID: 20586975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses to price and reimbursement decisions in Austria].
    Führlinger S
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2006 Dec; 156(23-24):612-8. PubMed ID: 17211765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of Health Technology Assessment in Drug Policies: Korea.
    Bae EY
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():24-29. PubMed ID: 30419447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Balancing early access with uncertainties in evidence for drugs authorized by prospective case series - systematic review of reimbursement decisions.
    Wallerstedt SM; Henriksson M
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 84(6):1146-1155. PubMed ID: 29381234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An application of a proposed framework for formulary listing in low-income countries: the case of Côte d'Ivoire.
    Diaby V; Lachaine J
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Nov; 9(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 22017499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Industry Survey on Unmet Needs in South Korea's New Drug Listing System.
    Kim S; Lee JY; Cho SH; Shin EJ; Kim M; Lee JH
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2023 Jul; 57(4):759-768. PubMed ID: 37183236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reimbursement and pricing of regenerative medicine in South Korea: key factors for achieving reimbursement.
    Cho E; Yoo SL; Kang Y; Lee JH
    Regen Med; 2020 Apr; 15(4):1550-1560. PubMed ID: 32356480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unravelling drug reimbursement outcomes: a comparative study of the role of pharmacoeconomic evidence in Dutch and Swedish reimbursement decision making.
    Franken M; Nilsson F; Sandmann F; de Boer A; Koopmanschap M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Sep; 31(9):781-97. PubMed ID: 23839699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.