108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2058729)
1. Defibrillation shocks increase myocardial pacing threshold: an intracellular microelectrode study.
Li HG; Jones DL; Yee R; Klein GJ
Am J Physiol; 1991 Jun; 260(6 Pt 2):H1973-9. PubMed ID: 2058729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transmembrane potential changes caused by shocks in guinea pig papillary muscle.
Zhou X; Smith WM; Rollins DL; Ideker RE
Am J Physiol; 1996 Dec; 271(6 Pt 2):H2536-46. PubMed ID: 8997315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prolongation and shortening of action potentials by electrical shocks in frog ventricular muscle.
Knisley SB; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Am J Physiol; 1994 Jun; 266(6 Pt 2):H2348-58. PubMed ID: 8023996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defibrillation shocks produce different effects on Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle: implications for successful defibrillation, refibrillation and postshock arrhythmia.
Li HG; Jones DL; Yee R; Klein GJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Aug; 22(2):607-14. PubMed ID: 8335836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High voltage shock induced cellular electrophysiological effects: transient refractoriness and bimodal changes in action potential duration.
Li HG; Jones DL; Yee R; Klein GJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1225-35. PubMed ID: 7659576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biphasic defibrillation waveforms reduce shock-induced response duration dispersion between low and high shock intensities.
Tovar OH; Jones JL
Circ Res; 1995 Aug; 77(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 7614727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and the refractory period.
Dillon SM
Circ Res; 1991 Sep; 69(3):842-56. PubMed ID: 1873877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation among fibrillation, defibrillation, and cardiac pacing.
Ideker RE; Zhou X; Knisley SB
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Mar; 18(3 Pt 2):512-25. PubMed ID: 7777416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responses of the transmembrane potential of myocardial cells during a shock.
Zhou X; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Apr; 6(4):252-63. PubMed ID: 7647950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevention of action potentials during extracellular electrical stimulation of long duration.
Zhou X; Smith WM; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 8(7):779-89. PubMed ID: 9255685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of postshock atrial pacing on atrial defibrillation outcome in the isolated sheep heart.
Skanes AC; Gray RA; Zuur CL; Jalife J
Circulation; 1998 Jul; 98(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 9665062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct measurements of membrane time constant during defibrillation strength shocks.
Sharma V; Qu F; Nikolski VP; DeGroot P; Efimov IR
Heart Rhythm; 2007 Apr; 4(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 17399638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Synchronized repolarization after defibrillation shocks. A possible component of the defibrillation process demonstrated by optical recordings in rabbit heart.
Dillon SM
Circulation; 1992 May; 85(5):1865-78. PubMed ID: 1572042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical transmembrane potential measurements during defibrillation-strength shocks in perfused rabbit hearts.
Zhou X; Ideker RE; Blitchington TF; Smith WM; Knisley SB
Circ Res; 1995 Sep; 77(3):593-602. PubMed ID: 7641329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arrhythmogenic effects of catecholamines are decreased in heart failure induced by rapid pacing in dogs.
Li HG; Jones DL; Yee R; Klein GJ
Am J Physiol; 1993 Nov; 265(5 Pt 2):H1654-62. PubMed ID: 8238576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of electroporation in defibrillation.
Al-Khadra A; Nikolski V; Efimov IR
Circ Res; 2000 Oct; 87(9):797-804. PubMed ID: 11055984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of quinidine and verapamil on electrically induced automaticity in the ventricular myocardium of guinea pig.
Grant AO; Katzung BG
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1976 Feb; 196(2):407-19. PubMed ID: 1255485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electroporation and shock-induced transmembrane potential in a cardiac fiber during defibrillation strength shocks.
DeBruin KA; Krassowska W
Ann Biomed Eng; 1998; 26(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 9662151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transmembrane potentials during high voltage shocks in ischemic cardiac tissue.
Holley LK; Knisley SB
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):146-52. PubMed ID: 9121979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of catecholamines on the residual sodium channel dependent slow conduction in guinea pig ventricular muscles under normoxia and hypoxia.
Hisatome I; Arita M
Cardiovasc Res; 1995 Jan; 29(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 7895241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
