These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20587430)

  • 1. Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula.
    Nicholas S; Tuuli MG; Dicke J; Macones GA; Stamilio D; Odibo AO
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 20587430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting birth weight in fetuses with gastroschisis.
    Zaki MN; Lusk LA; Overcash RT; Rao R; Truong YN; Liebowitz M; Porto M
    J Perinatol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):122-126. PubMed ID: 29266095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of sonographic estimation of weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects.
    Spaulding P; Edwards A; Coombs P; Davies-Tuck M; Robinson A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Oct; 60(5):766-772. PubMed ID: 32291746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is sonographic assessment of fetal weight influenced by formula selection?
    Burd I; Srinivas S; Paré E; Dharan V; Wang E
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Aug; 28(8):1019-24. PubMed ID: 19643784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of Neonatal Growth Restriction in Fetuses With Gastroschisis by Early Third Trimester Ultrasonography Utilizing Contemporary Birth Weight Percentiles.
    McKenna M; McKenna D; Zhou M; Sonek J; Wiegand S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2023 May; 42(5):997-1005. PubMed ID: 36177800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas for calculating estimated fetal weight in a preterm population in France.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Ancel PY; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):476.e1-476.e12. PubMed ID: 30118693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes.
    Warshafsky C; Ronzoni S; Quaglietta P; Weiner E; Zaltz A; Barrett J; Melamed N; Aviram A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Feb; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33607956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of estimated fetal weight assessment in fetuses with abdominal wall defects.
    Ha LC; Craig A; Grace MR; Osmundson SS; Taylor EW; Zuckerwise LC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100385. PubMed ID: 33895400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between estimated fetal weight and weight at birth in infants with gastroschisis and omphalocele.
    Boute T; Rizzo G; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Toneto BR; Moron AF; Rolo LC
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(16):3070-3075. PubMed ID: 32814485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of Formulas Using Fetal Thigh Soft Tissue Thickness in Estimating Weight in Gastroschisis.
    Chabra S; Sienas L; Hippe DS; Paulsene W; Dighe M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Oct; 39(10):1977-1983. PubMed ID: 32320090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation in Sweden.
    Lindström L; Cnattingius S; Axelsson O; Granfors M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jun; 102(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 36964980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do specific weight formulas for fetuses < or = 1500 g really improve weight estimation?
    Hoopmann M; Bernau B; Hart N; Schild RL; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Feb; 31(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 20091464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
    Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
    Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas.
    Esinler D; Bircan O; Esin S; Sahin EG; Kandemir O; Yalvac S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26183256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation models in extremely early-onset fetal growth restriction.
    Warrander LK; Ingram E; Heazell AEP; Johnstone ED
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):364-373. PubMed ID: 31596942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of sonography to predict estimated weight in fetuses with gastroschisis.
    Adams SR; Durfee S; Pettigrew C; Katz D; Jennings R; Ecker J; House M; Benson CB; Wolfberg A
    J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Nov; 31(11):1753-8. PubMed ID: 23091245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound Fetal Weight Estimation in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Pretscher J; Kehl S; Stumpfe FM; Mayr A; Schmid M; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Feb; 39(2):341-350. PubMed ID: 31436342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to delivery in a Chinese han population.
    Shen Y; Zhao W; Lin J; Liu F
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 45(8):465-471. PubMed ID: 28332212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.