409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20588119)
1. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of nonlinguistic sounds.
Inverso Y; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 20588119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.
Shafiro V; Gygi B; Cheng MY; Vachhani J; Mulvey M
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 21248643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.
Jung KH; Cho YS; Cho JK; Park GY; Kim EY; Hong SH; Chung WH; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users].
Wang S; Dong RJ; Li J; Zhou Y; Qi BE; Chen XQ; Liu B
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of non-speech sound memory in postlingual deafness: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation.
Lazard DS; Giraud AL; Truy E; Lee HJ
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2475-82. PubMed ID: 21557954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Speech recognition and language development in prelingually deafened children with multichannel cochlear prosthesis].
Cao K; Wei C; Wang Z; Jiao Z; Li Y
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 35(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12768681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recovery from forward masking in elderly cochlear implant users.
Lee ER; Friedland DR; Runge CL
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 22410729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
