These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2058966)

  • 1. Uterine versus tubal embryo transfer in the human. Comparative analysis of implantation, pregnancy, and live-birth rates.
    Asch RH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1991; 626():461-6. PubMed ID: 2058966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Embryo implantation rates in oocyte donation: a prospective comparison of tubal versus uterine transfers.
    Balmaceda JP; Alam V; Roszjtein D; Ord T; Snell K; Asch RH
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Feb; 57(2):362-5. PubMed ID: 1735489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative chance of pregnancy following tubal or uterine transfer procedures.
    Yovich JL; Yovich JM; Edirisinghe WR
    Fertil Steril; 1988 May; 49(5):858-64. PubMed ID: 3360175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tubal versus uterine transfer of cryopreserved embryos: a prospective randomized trial.
    Van Voorhis BJ; Syrop CH; Vincent RD; Chestnut DH; Sparks AE; Chapler FK
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Mar; 63(3):578-83. PubMed ID: 7851590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrograde tubal embryo transfer in natural cycle in-vitro fertilization.
    Kumar A; Benny P; Lenton EA; Cooke ID
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Mar; 12(3):484-6. PubMed ID: 9130746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Twice-frozen embryos are no detriment to pregnancy success: a retrospective comparative study.
    Koch J; Costello MF; Chapman MG; Kilani S
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jul; 96(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 21570070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted fertilization in infertile women with patent fallopian tubes. A comparison of in-vitro fertilization, gamete intra-fallopian transfer and tubal embryo stage transfer.
    Tanbo T; Dale PO; Abyholm T
    Hum Reprod; 1990 Apr; 5(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 2351708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is tubal embryo transfer of any value? A meta-analysis and comparison with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database.
    Habana AE; Palter SF
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Aug; 76(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 11476774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing abdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer.
    Porat N; Boehnlein LM; Schouweiler CM; Kang J; Lindheim SR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Apr; 36(2):384-92. PubMed ID: 20492392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tubal embryo transfer in cynomolgus monkeys: effects of hyperstimulation and synchrony.
    Balmaceda JP; Gastaldi C; Ord T; Borrero C; Asch RH
    Hum Reprod; 1988 May; 3(4):441-3. PubMed ID: 3392178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Injection of day 2 embryo culture supernatant into the uterine cavity did not improve the pregnancy rate of day 3 embryo transfer in patients who underwent in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial.
    Zhu W; Li X; Fu Z; Tang Z; Chen X; Zhou Y; Geng Q
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2216-21. PubMed ID: 19439284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcervical tubal embryo-stage transfer (TC-TEST).
    Yovich JL; Draper RR; Turner SR; Cummins JM
    J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1990 Jun; 7(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 2380619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Basal Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Level as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Freezing-all Embryo Transfer Program.
    Li XL; Huang R; Fang C; Liang XY
    Curr Med Sci; 2018 Oct; 38(5):861-867. PubMed ID: 30341521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
    Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atosiban improves implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with repeated implantation failure.
    Lan VT; Khang VN; Nhu GH; Tuong HM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Sep; 25(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 22818095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer of uterine implantation blastocysts to the oviduct in mice.
    Bronson R; Cunnane M
    Fertil Steril; 1975 May; 26(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 1126467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of embryo transfer depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes].
    Zhao XH; Song XR; Sui XL; Bai XH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 42(8):530-2. PubMed ID: 17983491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Office hysteroscopy improves pregnancy rates following IVF.
    Karayalçin R; Ozyer S; Ozcan S; Uzunlar O; Gürlek B; Moraloğlu O; Batioğlu S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Sep; 25(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 22818094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uterine flushing with supernatant embryo culture medium in vitrified warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamath MS; Mascarenhas M; B K; Vasani NN; Joshi A; K M; George K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Feb; 32(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 25428435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI.
    Tomaževič T; Ban-Frangež H; Virant-Klun I; Verdenik I; Požlep B; Vrtačnik-Bokal E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 20864409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.