109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20590044)
1. MDS 3.0 promises positive change.
Kaldy J
Provider; 2010 Jun; 36(6):22-3, 25-6, 28 passim. PubMed ID: 20590044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Getting ready for MDS--again.
Infante M
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Mar; 18(3):67. PubMed ID: 10141059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new look at incontinence.
Klusch L
Provider; 2010 Jun; 36(6):47, 49, 51 passim. PubMed ID: 20590047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting ready for MDS 3.0: patient evaluation takes a new turn.
Martin CM
Consult Pharm; 2010 Jul; 25(7):404-6, 411-5. PubMed ID: 20601346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Focus on caregiving. Learning to love the MDS.
Littlehale S
Provider; 2001 May; 27(5):51-3. PubMed ID: 11840634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspectives. Quality data: how good is it?
Vibbert S
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Jan; 43(3):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10291500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding MDS.
Dunning K
Rehab Manag; 1999; 12(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 10788188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes measures are a necessity.
Jackson DL
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Mar; 18(3):88. PubMed ID: 10141060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HCFA hears stakeholders agree: survey doesn't get job done.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1996 Sep; 4(19):1-4. PubMed ID: 10161629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. HCFA publishes final rule on resident assessments, electronic submission of MDS (minimum data set).
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Jan; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10176608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. MDS (minimum data set) rules offer increased involvement in patient care issues.
Sherman D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Mar; 16(3):86, 88. PubMed ID: 10125760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Preparing for a survey: focusing on urinary incontinence.
Thompson DL
Director; 2007; 15(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 19348051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. CR 5567: Data collection in hospice: what it means to hospice providers.
Kennedy J
Home Healthc Nurse; 2008 May; 26(5):317-20. PubMed ID: 18469607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicare and Medicaid programs; long-term care survey--HCFA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1985 Oct; 50(211):45584-7. PubMed ID: 10300398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximizing data quality of the minimum data set.
Zender A
J AHIMA; 1998 Jun; 69(6):32. PubMed ID: 10180096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommendations for improving resident assessment. MDS (Minimum data set) revisions essential for computerization.
Furst S
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Jun; 16(6):120, 112. PubMed ID: 10126408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The MDS 3.0 and its impact on bladder and bowel care.
Klusch L
Provider; 2012 Jun; 38(6):33, 35, 37 passim. PubMed ID: 22834204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sorry marks for nursing homes.
Findlay S
US News World Rep; 1988 Dec; 105(23):92-3. PubMed ID: 10291064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. OBRA. Pulling the pieces together.
Hegland A
Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Aug; 13(8):26-8, 58, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10106832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. S.D. nursing homes in outcomes project.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1996 Jun; 26(25):24, 30. PubMed ID: 10157998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
