These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20591441)

  • 1. The frequency of electrocardiographic errors due to electrode cable switches: a before and after study.
    Thaler T; Tempelmann V; Maggiorini M; Rudiger A
    J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(6):676-81. PubMed ID: 20591441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of cardiograph design and automated algorithms on the incidence and detection of electrode cable reversals in an academic electrocardiogram laboratory.
    Nilsson KR; Sewell PM; Blunden-Kasdorf P; Starkey K; Grant AO; Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 18721645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left arm/left leg lead reversals at the cable junction box: A cause for an epidemic of errors.
    Velagapudi P; Turagam MK; Ritter S; Dohrmann ML
    J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(1):111-114. PubMed ID: 27457728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrocardiographic artifacts due to electrode misplacement and their frequency in different clinical settings.
    Rudiger A; Hellermann JP; Mukherjee R; Follath F; Turina J
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Feb; 25(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 17276807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recording electrocardiograms using 3-limb lead cables instead of the standard 4: a modification to minimize incorrect electrode placements.
    Soliman EZ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):391-2. PubMed ID: 18440548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An unusual case of electrode misplacement: left arm and V(2) electrode reversal.
    García-Niebla J; García PL
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):380-1. PubMed ID: 18572182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorrect electrode cable connection during electrocardiographic recording.
    Batchvarov VN; Malik M; Camm AJ
    Europace; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1081-90. PubMed ID: 17932025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrocardiographic artifact induced by an electrical stimulator implanted for management of neurogenic bladder.
    Madias JE
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):401-3. PubMed ID: 18440549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Erroneous electrocardiogram recordings because of switched electrode leads.
    Greenfield JC
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):376-7. PubMed ID: 18358487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Jowett NI; Turner AM; Cole A; Jones PA
    Postgrad Med J; 2005 Feb; 81(952):122-5. PubMed ID: 15701746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences.
    Bogun F; Anh D; Kalahasty G; Wissner E; Bou Serhal C; Bazzi R; Weaver WD; Schuger C
    Am J Med; 2004 Nov; 117(9):636-42. PubMed ID: 15501200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal and postural variation of 12-lead high-frequency QRS electrocardiographic signals in asymptomatic individuals.
    Douglas PK; Batdorf NJ; Evans RT; Feiveson AH; Arenare B; Schlegel TT
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 16777512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A flatline lead I results from bilateral arm-to-leg electrode exchange.
    Hoffman I
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):388-90. PubMed ID: 18358484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A flatline electrocardiogram in lead II is a marker for right arm/right leg electrode switch.
    Hoffman I
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):226-7. PubMed ID: 16916521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer error and acceptable standards for electrocardiographic interpretation.
    Spodick DH
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):348-9. PubMed ID: 16697395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of resident call eligibility on major discrepancy rate.
    Flink CC; Mueller JS; Kiproff PM
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1299-301. PubMed ID: 20650664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of limb electrode placement on the 12- and 16-lead electrocardiogram.
    Farrell RM; Syed A; Syed A; Gutterman DD
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 18790505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A bad day for quality control: sequential misplacement of left arm and left leg electrodes.
    Greenfield JC
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 17727877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: "A bad day for quality control: sequential misplacement of left arm and left leg electrodes".
    Rowlands DJ; Moore PR
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 18191651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.