160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20591700)
1. Integration accuracy of digital dental models and 3-dimensional computerized tomography images by sequential point- and surface-based markerless registration.
Kim BC; Lee CE; Park W; Kang SH; Zhengguo P; Yi CK; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 20591700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning: 3D virtual articulator: technical note.
Ghanai S; Marmulla R; Wiechnik J; Mühling J; Kotrikova B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 39(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 20005674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical experiences of digital model surgery and the rapid-prototyped wafer for maxillary orthognathic surgery.
Kim BC; Lee CE; Park W; Kim MK; Zhengguo P; Yu HS; Yi CK; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Mar; 111(3):278-85.e1. PubMed ID: 20692187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new method to move mandible to intercuspal position in virtual three-dimensional orthognathic surgery by integrating primary occlusion model.
Dai J; Wang X; Hu G; Shen SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):e484-9. PubMed ID: 22907113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods for managing 3-dimensional volumes.
Othman AA; El-Beialy AR; Fawzy SA; Kandil AH; El-Bialy AM; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 20152685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial soft tissue esthetic predictions: validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery with cone beam computed tomography data.
Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Amadori S; Sarti A; Marchetti C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20561464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer planning and intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery.
Bell RB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):592-605. PubMed ID: 21353924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate computerised mandibular simulation in orthognathic surgery: a new method for integrating the planned postoperative occlusion model.
Kang SH; Kim MK; Park WS; Lee SH
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 48(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 19616350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup.
Macchi A; Carrafiello G; Cacciafesta V; Norcini A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 16679200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model.
Gateno J; Xia J; Teichgraeber JF; Rosen A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 12619001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel method of computer aided orthognathic surgery using individual CAD/CAM templates: a combination of osteotomy and repositioning guides.
Li B; Zhang L; Sun H; Yuan J; Shen SG; Wang X
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):e239-44. PubMed ID: 23566536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery for correction of facial asymmetry: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial.
De Riu G; Meloni SM; Baj A; Corda A; Soma D; Tullio A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 24418178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CAD/CAM surface templates as an alternative to the intermediate wafer in orthognathic surgery.
Bai S; Bo B; Bi Y; Wang B; Zhao J; Liu Y; Feng Z; Shang H; Zhao Y
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):e1-7. PubMed ID: 20813559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional computer tomography (CT) in the evaluation of placement for dental implants.
Lee CY
Hawaii Dent J; 1996; 27(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 11908285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual model surgery and wafer fabrication using 2-dimensional cephalograms, 3-dimensional virtual dental models, and stereolithographic technology.
Choi JY; Hwang JM; Baek SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Feb; 113(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 22677736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoral Scanning and Setting Up the Digital Final Occlusion in Three-Dimensional Planning of Orthognathic Surgery: Its Comparison with the Dental Model Approach.
Ho CT; Lin HH; Lo LJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1027e-1036e. PubMed ID: 31033828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
