These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20592553)

  • 1. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening by high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples.
    Balasubramanian A; Kulasingam SL; Baer A; Hughes JP; Myers ER; Mao C; Kiviat NB; Koutsky LA
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Jul; 14(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 20592553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
    Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.
    Östensson E; Hellström AC; Hellman K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Wilander E; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 23530870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
    Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.
    Wright TC; Denny L; Kuhn L; Pollack A; Lorincz A
    JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 10632284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial.
    Lazcano-Ponce E; Lorincz AT; Cruz-Valdez A; Salmerón J; Uribe P; Velasco-Mondragón E; Nevarez PH; Acosta RD; Hernández-Avila M
    Lancet; 2011 Nov; 378(9806):1868-73. PubMed ID: 22051739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of dry vaginal self-sampling for detecting high-risk human papillomavirus infection in cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study.
    Haguenoer K; Giraudeau B; Gaudy-Graffin C; de Pinieux I; Dubois F; Trignol-Viguier N; Viguier J; Marret H; Goudeau A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 134(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 24905772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.
    van Rosmalen J; de Kok IM; van Ballegooijen M
    BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 22251259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
    Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of self-collected vaginal specimens for the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus infection and the prediction of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions in a high-burden, low-resource setting.
    Toliman PJ; Kaldor JM; Badman SG; Phillips S; Tan G; Brotherton JML; Saville M; Vallely AJ; Tabrizi SN
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 Apr; 25(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 29906593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of HPV self-testing offered to non-attendees in cervical cancer screening in Switzerland.
    Vassilakos P; Poncet A; Catarino R; Viviano M; Petignat P; Combescure C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 30718124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening.
    Naucler P; Ryd W; Törnberg S; Strand A; Wadell G; Elfgren K; Rådberg T; Strander B; Forslund O; Hansson BG; Hagmar B; Johansson B; Rylander E; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jan; 101(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 19141778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
    JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Human Papillomavirus Testing on Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples in a Referral Population.
    Cho HW; Hong JH; Min KJ; Ouh YT; Seong SJ; Moon JH; Cho SH; Lee JK
    Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jul; 53(3):829-836. PubMed ID: 33421987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening.
    Snijders PJ; Verhoef VM; Arbyn M; Ogilvie G; Minozzi S; Banzi R; van Kemenade FJ; Heideman DA; Meijer CJ
    Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2223-36. PubMed ID: 22907569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
    Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination.
    Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Stout NK; Salomon JA; Kuntz KM; Goldie SJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):308-20. PubMed ID: 18314477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analytical performance of HPV assays on vaginal self-collected vs practitioner-collected cervical samples: the SCoPE study.
    Saville M; Hawkes D; Keung M; Ip E; Silvers J; Sultana F; Malloy MJ; Velentzis LS; Canfel L K; Wrede CD; Brotherton J
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Jun; 127():104375. PubMed ID: 32361328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.