521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20593134)
1. Transulnar artery approach for percutaneous coronary intervention: an alternative route in a patient with challenging transfemoral access and hypoplastic radial artery.
Chiam PT; Lim VY
Singapore Med J; 2010 May; 51(5):e81-4. PubMed ID: 20593134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transradial and transulnar access for percutaneous coronary interventions.
Kedev S
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2011 Jun; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 21646838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transulnar approach as an alternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial approach failure.
de Andrade PB; Tebet MA; Nogueira EF; Esteves VC; de Andrade MV; Labrunie A; Piva e Mattos LA
Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 23067902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transulnar access for coronary angiography and intervention: an early review to guide research and clinical practice.
Roberts EB; Palmer N; Perry RA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Feb; 19(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 17268043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial. The Transulnar or Transradial Instead of Coronary Transfemoral Angiographies Study (the AURA of ARTEMIS Study).
Hahalis G; Tsigkas G; Xanthopoulou I; Deftereos S; Ziakas A; Raisakis K; Pappas C; Sourgounis A; Grapsas N; Davlouros P; Galati A; Plakomyti TE; Mylona P; Styliadis I; Pyrgakis V; Alexopoulos D
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 23735472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: effect on vascular access site complications.
Nadarasa K; Robertson MC; Wong CK; Green BK; Chen VH; Wilkins GT; Williams MJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Mar; 79(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 21523899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transradial interventions: our experience.
Chag M; Gupta S
Indian Heart J; 2010; 62(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 21275307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.
Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The transradial approach is associated with lower risk of adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center experience.
Wu C; Liao D; Dyer AM; Chen H; Gilchrist IC
J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Mar; 23(3):88-92. PubMed ID: 21364235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The transulnar approach for coronary intervention: a safe alternative to transradial approach in selected patients.
Mangin L; Bertrand OF; De La Rochellière R; Proulx G; Lemay R; Barbeau G; Gleeton O; Rodés-Cabau J; Nguyen CM; Roy L
J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 17(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 15687529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study.
Aptecar E; Pernes JM; Chabane-Chaouch M; Bussy N; Catarino G; Shahmir A; Bougrini K; Dupouy P
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 May; 67(5):711-20. PubMed ID: 16557601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomical considerations in transradial intervention.
Chandarana A; Baxi H
Indian Heart J; 2010; 62(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 21275294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial access for coronary angiography and angioplasty: a novel approach.
Lim VY; Chan CN; Kwok V; Mak KH; Koh TH
Singapore Med J; 2003 Nov; 44(11):563-9. PubMed ID: 15007495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transradial intervention of iliac and superficial femoral artery disease is feasible.
Sanghvi K; Kurian D; Coppola J
J Interv Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 21(5):385-7. PubMed ID: 18705637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transradial primary angioplasty and stenting in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction: acute results and 6-month follow-up.
Ranjan A; Patel TM; Shah SC; Malhotra H; Patel R; Vayada N; Pothiwala R; Fonseca K; Tanwar NS
Indian Heart J; 2005; 57(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 16521638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and safety of elective transradial coronary intervention in Asian females.
Maddury J; Kaushik M; Madhavapeddi A; Babu S; Kumar N; Varma JL; Alla V
J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Mar; 23(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 21364237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available.
Kedev S; Zafirovska B; Dharma S; Petkoska D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):E51-60. PubMed ID: 23832623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate results of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: transradial versus transfemoral approach.
Hsueh SK; Hsieh YK; Wu CJ; Fang CY; Youssef AA; Chen CJ; Chen SM; Yang CH; Yip HK; Chen MC; Fu M; Cheng CI
Chang Gung Med J; 2008; 31(2):190-200. PubMed ID: 18567420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous transulnar artery approach for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention.
Aptecar E; Dupouy P; Chabane-Chaouch M; Bussy N; Catarino G; Shahmir A; Elhajj Y; Pernes JM
J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 17(6):312-7. PubMed ID: 16003006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.
Rathore S; Roberts E; Hakeem AR; Pauriah M; Beaumont A; Morris JL
J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 22(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 19689657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
