These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20593329)

  • 1. Construct validity of RT3 accelerometer: a comparison of level-ground and treadmill walking at self-selected speeds.
    Hendrick P; Boyd T; Low O; Takarangi K; Paterson M; Claydon L; Milosavljevic S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 20593329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity.
    Nichols JF; Morgan CG; Sarkin JA; Sallis JF; Calfas KJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Jun; 31(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 10378921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accelerometer prediction of energy expenditure: vector magnitude versus vertical axis.
    Howe CA; Staudenmayer JW; Freedson PS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Dec; 41(12):2199-206. PubMed ID: 19915498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of energy expenditure in children using the RT3 accelerometer.
    Kavouras SA; Sarras SE; Tsekouras YE; Sidossis LS
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jul; 26(9):959-66. PubMed ID: 18569562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of the Actical activity monitor for assessing steps and energy expenditure during walking.
    Johnson M; Meltz K; Hart K; Schmudlach M; Clarkson L; Borman K
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(8):769-76. PubMed ID: 25356920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equivalence of accelerometer data for walking and running: treadmill versus on land.
    Vanhelst J; Zunquin G; Theunynck D; Mikulovic J; Bui-Xuan G; Beghin L
    J Sports Sci; 2009 May; 27(7):669-75. PubMed ID: 19424900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of speed and step frequency during walking and running on motion sensor output.
    Rowlands AV; Stone MR; Eston RG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Apr; 39(4):716-27. PubMed ID: 17414811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitating physical activity in COPD using a triaxial accelerometer.
    Steele BG; Holt L; Belza B; Ferris S; Lakshminaryan S; Buchner DM
    Chest; 2000 May; 117(5):1359-67. PubMed ID: 10807823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of RT3 accelerometer for measuring mobility in people with multiple sclerosis: pilot study.
    Hale L; Williams K; Ashton C; Connole T; McDowell H; Taylor C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2007; 44(4):619-27. PubMed ID: 18247259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Tracmor triaxial accelerometer system for walking.
    Levine JA; Baukol PA; Westerterp KR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Sep; 33(9):1593-7. PubMed ID: 11528350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer for the assessment of physical activity.
    Rowlands AV; Thomas PW; Eston RG; Topping R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Mar; 36(3):518-24. PubMed ID: 15076796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does a waist-worn accelerometer capture intra- and inter-person variation in walking behavior among persons with multiple sclerosis?
    Motl RW; Sosnoff JJ; Dlugonski D; Suh Y; Goldman M
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Dec; 32(10):1224-8. PubMed ID: 20875952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring moderate-intensity walking in older adults using the ActiGraph accelerometer.
    Barnett A; van den Hoek D; Barnett D; Cerin E
    BMC Geriatr; 2016 Dec; 16(1):211. PubMed ID: 27931188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the RT3 accelerometer to measure everyday activity in functionally impaired older people.
    Sumukadas D; Laidlaw S; Witham MD
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2008 Feb; 20(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18283223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of gait parameters at different surface inclinations and speeds using an instrumented treadmill system.
    Item-Glatthorn JF; Casartelli NC; Maffiuletti NA
    Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():259-64. PubMed ID: 27004668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new device to estimate VO2 during incline walking by accelerometry and barometry.
    Yamazaki T; Gen-No H; Kamijo Y; Okazaki K; Masuki S; Nose H
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Dec; 41(12):2213-9. PubMed ID: 19920753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.
    Le Masurier GC; Tudor-Locke C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):867-71. PubMed ID: 12750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the RT3 Research Tracker and Tritrac R3D accelerometers.
    DeVoe D; Gotshall R; McArthur T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):510-8. PubMed ID: 14620239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accelerometer output and its association with energy expenditure in persons with multiple sclerosis.
    Sandroff BM; Motl RW; Suh Y
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 22773205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking.
    White SC; Yack HJ; Tucker CA; Lin HY
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Oct; 30(10):1537-42. PubMed ID: 9789855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.