BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20593920)

  • 1. An enhanced thirteen-week bioassay as an alternative for screening for carcinogenesis factors.
    Cohen SM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 20593920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of the uses of rats and mice for assessing carcinogenic risk from chemicals in humans.
    Ward JM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(1):18. PubMed ID: 20593921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An enhanced 13-week bioassay: an alternative to the 2-year bioassay to screen for human carcinogenesis.
    Cohen SM
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Sep; 62(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 19616417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human carcinogenic risk evaluation: an alternative approach to the two-year rodent bioassay.
    Cohen SM
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Aug; 80(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 15129023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of possible carcinogenic risk to humans based on liver tumors in rodent assays: the two-year bioassay is no longer necessary.
    Cohen SM
    Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):487-501. PubMed ID: 20215581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medium-term bioassays in rats for rapid detection of the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
    Shirai T; Hirose M; Ito N
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):251-72. PubMed ID: 10353390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternative models for carcinogenicity testing: weight of evidence evaluations across models.
    Cohen SM
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():183-90. PubMed ID: 11695556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A perspective on current and future uses of alternative models for carcinogenicity testing.
    Goodman JI
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():173-6. PubMed ID: 11695554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expectations for transgenic rodent cancer bioassay models.
    Ashby J
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():177-82. PubMed ID: 11695555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Vitro-In Vivo Carcinogenicity.
    Steinberg P
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2017; 157():81-96. PubMed ID: 27506831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary on "Evaluation of possible carcinogenic risk to humans based on liver tumors in rodent assays: the two-year bioassay is no longer necessary".
    Long GG
    Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):502-5. PubMed ID: 20124495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neonatal mouse model: review of methods and results.
    McClain RM; Keller D; Casciano D; Fu P; MacDonald J; Popp J; Sagartz J
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():128-37. PubMed ID: 11695548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternatives to the 2-species bioassay for the identification of potential human carcinogens.
    Ashby J
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Mar; 15(3):183-202. PubMed ID: 8839204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A data-based assessment of alternative strategies for identification of potential human cancer hazards.
    Boobis AR; Cohen SM; Doerrer NG; Galloway SM; Haley PJ; Hard GC; Hess FG; Macdonald JS; Thibault S; Wolf DC; Wright J
    Toxicol Pathol; 2009 Oct; 37(6):714-32. PubMed ID: 19700658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: alternative to the chronic rodent bioassay.
    Flammang TJ; Tungeln LS; Kadlubar FF; Fu PP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 9356286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Panel discussion on the application of alternative models to cancer risk assessment.
    Pettit SD
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():191-5. PubMed ID: 11695557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of human cancer risk: challenges for alternative approaches.
    Omenn GS
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():5-12. PubMed ID: 11695561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioassays of shortened duration for drugs: statistical implications.
    Kodell RL; Lin KK; Thorn BT; Chen JJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2000 Jun; 55(2):415-32. PubMed ID: 10828275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.