These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP. Burnett MG; Stein SC; Bartels RH J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jul; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 20594016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response to the Letter-to-the-Editor Regarding "The Two Year Cost Effectiveness of Three Options to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients". Mekail N; Udeh B Pain Pract; 2014 Sep; 14(7):e163-4. PubMed ID: 25124314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Regarding: Udeh BL, et al. The 2-year Cost-effectiveness of 3 Options to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients. Pain Pract 2014 Jan 3 [epub ahead of print]. Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Hirsch JA Pain Pract; 2014 Sep; 14(7):e161-2. PubMed ID: 25113809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of Posterior Decompression Techniques Compared With Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis. Pich J Orthop Nurs; 2018; 37(5):318-319. PubMed ID: 30247416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative evaluation of quality of life in lumbar spinal stenosis patients following instrumented posterior decompression. Aykaç B; Copuroğlu C; Ozcan M; Ciftdemir M; Yalnız E Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2011; 45(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21478662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression? Morgalla MH; Noak N; Merkle M; Tatagiba MS J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 21235300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Lumbar spinal stenosis: scientific evidence of surgical treatment]. Faundez AA Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Mar; 5(194):582-4. PubMed ID: 19405274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study. Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. X-Stop Resulted in a Higher Reoperation Rate Than Minimally Invasive Decompression, But Both Decreased Symptoms of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Huddleston P J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(22):1889. PubMed ID: 26582619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients. Udeh BL; Costandi S; Dalton JE; Ghosh R; Yousef H; Mekhail N Pain Pract; 2015 Feb; 15(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 24393198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note. Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Point of view. Lurie JD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):86. PubMed ID: 25569525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Herno A; Airaksinen O; Saari T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1471-4. PubMed ID: 8235818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]